On 2018-04-07 12:49:51 Victoria said:
Are you a black man that is misrepresenting himself to ladies with a ROAR policy?
When you call Ladies with a Roar policy are you honest or are you a chancer that likes to put ladies who are physically & emotionally uncomfortable with black men in a position where they feel "obliged" or "forced" to cater to you?
RESPECT is and always will be the KEY to getting what you really want in this world.
I truly hope you find the perfect companion.
On 2018-04-07 12:19:38 Kitty said:
but unless someone actually uses a racial slur or reason. Please don't assume its racist...
On 2018-04-07 11:07:12 chancetaker said:
On 2018-04-07 10:56:42 Oscar 1000 said: What I don't understand is why is that ROAR, mostly means black guys? Is it the darkness of their skin? Is it because they believe all black guys are ugly? What is it exactly...
ROAR is a euphemism the racist wgs use to say I don't see people of colour. It basically works on the same apartheid scale (ironically). So some will still see indians, then less will see coloureds, none will see black guys. It's that old conditioning that black is dirty, unclean and dangerous. Your not as upper class if a black person has touched you kinda thing.
On 2018-04-07 13:44:35 chancetaker said:
On 2018-04-07 12:19:38 Kitty said:
but unless someone actually uses a racial slur or reason. Please don't assume its racist...
This has got to be THE MOST IGNORANT thing I've read in a long time. So as long as you didn't call me the K-word you are allowed to treat a black person however you want. THAT right there is why there are so many racial outburst on that white people just don't seem to get.
I've had this argument time and time again on this forum and its getting really tired, so I'm going to say three points then I'm done.
1. 'ROAR'/or the act of discriminating against someone purely based on their race (like saying I will not provide a service to a black person) is racist. This is not 'my opinion' or conjecture, it's a fact. If it meets the definition, it's racists end of story.
2. I used to feel angry that people seem to tolerate these racist attitudes on here but now I'm okay with it. If you feel ROAR is okay then I should have no problem with BEE, preferential procurement and land reform.
3. WGs provide a service, on mass, to the general public for profit purposes. (They are always at pains to remind us on this very forum that they are not here to find boyfriends). They are just like a bank giving you a loan, an employer giving you a job or a government helping you farm. So that throws out the whole 'personal preference' rubbish of an argument.
I will end with one thing. No one is saying you must stop your racial preferencing. Go right ahead.
I will say this though: if you have the kinda attitude that thinks this is okay, you can't then be surprised and shocked why people act like Julius Malema does and why people support him like they do and why they will gladly support the Vicky Momberg sentence but vigorously defend Julius and struggle to vote DA.
PS: (now you can feel free to misinterpreted my statement as 'saying white wgs refusing to fuck black guys caused Julius'... i know some idiot is going to say that)