Sage says:

I don't agree as the SP in question propably gives consistent good service and doesn't actually scam people.

The loan was a personal loan and not a service agreement.
Her defaulting on a personal loan has nothing to do with quality of service.

Not excusing her behaviour but personal matters have little to nothing to do with professional service rendered



Actions should have consequences.

She should be named and shamed so as to enable informed punter choice.

On 2018-10-11 10:03:14 FMS said:
Sage says:

I don't agree as the SP in question propably gives consistent good service and doesn't actually scam people.

The loan was a personal loan and not a service agreement.
Her defaulting on a personal loan has nothing to do with quality of service.

Not excusing her behaviour but personal matters have little to nothing to do with professional service rendered



Actions should have consequences.

She should be named and shamed so as to enable informed punter choice.

Yes and the consequence is that she has lost a friend.

Personal vs professional
If both parties kept to business this would not have happened at all.

Must we do IRC checks on every service provider to test how "honorable" she is?

Sage

What happens to the next punter who falls for this. Is this not one of the reasons why we have this forum? It's clear that PeterPan was comfortable making this loan based on service and reputation if anything it lulled him into a false sense of security. We don;t need to judge her for her service but if she asks for a loan we know how to respond.

U have a good heart PETERPAN959.
Something good will come from it . I believe in Karma

On 2018-10-11 10:03:14 FMS said:
Sage says:

I don't agree as the SP in question propably gives consistent good service and doesn't actually scam people.

The loan was a personal loan and not a service agreement.
Her defaulting on a personal loan has nothing to do with quality of service.

Not excusing her behaviour but personal matters have little to nothing to do with professional service rendered



Actions should have consequences.

She should be named and shamed so as to enable informed punter choice.

If you name and shame her you're taking away her income and any chance that dear mister Pete will ever see a cent.

Lets not burn the school for free education please

I appreciate your counter argument d--b.
I still believe that a professional lady will not ask client's for loans.
On this by all means mention it in your review.
I'm merely debating destroying a lady's only means of income through public shaming when the problem isn't bad service just bad morals

The reality is that if I have unpaid loans and am blacklisted, many doors would close for me. It is harsh but its the truth, there can be many reasons why the lady in question hasn't honored her agreement but no punter should fall foul of this kind of behavior. Samson, Delilah and all that jazz.......

I do not believe naming her would deprive her of her livelihood.

In no ways do her skills to con and deceive affect her ability to provide a good or even above average punt.

It would however warn punters to be on their guard.

In fact I for one may book her if I know who she is which may, if enough punters share my view, put her in the position to start paying back the loan.

On 2018-10-11 10:51:31 d--b said:
Sage

What happens to the next punter who falls for this. Is this not one of the reasons why we have this forum? It's clear that PeterPan was comfortable making this loan based on service and reputation if anything it lulled him into a false sense of security. We don;t need to judge her for her service but if she asks for a loan we know how to respond.

If you can't afford to 'lose' the money, don't give it away, simples

On 2018-10-11 12:55:25 Celia said:
On 2018-10-11 10:03:14 FMS said: Sage says:

I don't agree as the SP in question propably gives consistent good service and doesn't actually scam people.

The loan was a personal loan and not a service agreement.
Her defaulting on a personal loan has nothing to do with quality of service.

Not excusing her behaviour but personal matters have little to nothing to do with professional service rendered



Actions should have consequences.

She should be named and shamed so as to enable informed punter choice.



If you name and shame her you're taking away her income and any chance that dear mister Pete will ever see a cent.

Lets not burn the school for free education please

Definitely great argument