Petty.
On 2019-08-06 18:58:21 Honorable Member said:
By that logic, anyone that mentions wanking should be banned as well.
Petty.
Easy there bro, you could be banned for farting whilst replying to my comment !
On 2019-08-06 18:58:21 Honorable Member said:
By that logic, anyone that mentions wanking should be banned as well.
Petty.
Your hand is a service provider to you(wanking) so if you want to refer to your hand and how good it is, make sure you register your hand on esa
Edited: 2019-08-07 03:00:56
...How can you even think of bullshiting her, what do you take her for, she is clearly not an idiot I am.
Thank you for the response. I'm not speaking on behalf of other punters, I'm adding my view in the matter with the respectful understanding that it's your business and the final decision is still yours in the end.
Your USP, as a website is built upon two main pillars; the review system reduces risks for punters and a robust forum keeps people coming onto the site even where they don't end up punting.
The fact is this; the review system itself has been defeated by a few WGs. Getting away from the reviews that are the main source of value for punters is as easy as creating a new profile with a new number. Some WGs cycle through tons of profiles to get awsy from bad reviews and so valuable reviews are lost in the system. Your USP is under threat.
The move to ban people for blatantly misusing your platform is understandable. I've said such on a different thread but I don't agree with the way it's being done.
People are walking on eggshells because of this and it has already been noted that the forum isn't as robust as it used to be.
At the end of the day, it is your business though and we aren't trying to make decisions for you. You are the final arbiter but I do hope that you strongly consider the impact of your policies in line with your business's unique assets.
On 2019-08-03 20:38:56 Master Bruce Wayne said:
...
So are there any other juicy stories within the confines of the freeloading policy?
There are some. They're under the reviews section. Nothing so elaborate or exciting but you can find marketing and political talk in the general forum now.
On 2019-08-07 05:51:47 RShaft said:
To Antoinette
Thank you for the response. I'm not speaking on behalf of other punters, I'm adding my view in the matter with the respectful understanding that it's your business and the final decision is still yours in the end.
Your USP, as a website is built upon two main pillars; the review system reduces risks for punters and a robust forum keeps people coming onto the site even where they don't end up punting.
The fact is this; the review system itself has been defeated by a few WGs. Getting away from the reviews that are the main source of value for punters is as easy as creating a new profile with a new number. Some WGs cycle through tons of profiles to get awsy from bad reviews and so valuable reviews are lost in the system. Your USP is under threat.
The move to ban people for blatantly misusing your platform is understandable. I've said such on a different thread but I don't agree with the way it's being done.
People are walking on eggshells because of this and it has already been noted that the forum isn't as robust as it used to be.
At the end of the day, it is your business though and we aren't trying to make decisions for you. You are the final arbiter but I do hope that you strongly consider the impact of your policies in line with your business's unique assets.
Hit the nail in the head.
On 2019-08-07 06:05:35 Need4Passion said:
you can find marketing and political talk in the general forum now.
Marketing, political talk, useless surveys and games like Word Association.
You said "We punters will never understand" that is speaking for others. When you speak for yourself you refer to yourself only.
2019-08-07 06:13:11 [Quote] The fact is this; the review system itself has been defeated by a few WGs. Getting away from the reviews that are the main source of value for punters is as easy as creating a new profile with a new number. Some WGs cycle through tons of profiles to get awsy from bad reviews and so valuable reviews are lost in the system. Your USP is under threat.[Quote]
This was not a point of contention in our previous post to me but we can address this now, we have implemented a way for punters to see if the advertiser have previous profiles that are no longer active and we have explained what to look for when you see this, it reads "Many Active ads should not be viewed in a bad light and shows good business sense.
More than 4 Deactivated ads may point to trouble as the advertiser might have abandoned old ads with negative reviews.2"
There is no policy regarding advertisers closing one profile to open another due to negative comments or reviews thus the implementation of the "Related adverts section" for your information.
Other than that you can search the forum for previous reviews on the advertiser if you have her previous work name. There is no harm in doing your homework before booking.
Also, look out for comments under the profile, many punters are very clued up when it comes to the ladies changing their profiles and they point it out saying that she used to be X.
The implementation of the freeloading policy is not one that we made lightly, we spend many months going through all possibilities, all the pro and cons to having this policy and we decided that due to the frequent mention of non-advertisers we need to put a stop to it. So what I am saying now is that unfortunately, you as punters brought this upon your self.
Yes, there is the occasion that the mention of, "does anyone know where Y is" is innocent and the punter is genuinely looking for her to book her, but in most cases, this is not the situation and the punter is asking to attract attention to a certain individual who does not advertise on Escort South Africa, and we do not have the time to analyse every post in such detail.
We do not want to ban anyone as we get no joy from diluting our userbase, but we can not let the users do as they please at the cost of the advertiser losing appointments or on our dime.
We are looking at freeloading on a case to case basis when a user asks about an advertiser we look to see if the advert is active at the time of the post and if by any chance the advertiser may be changed her name.
It is extremely frustrating to be explaining this policy over and over just because you don't think it should be dealt with the way we choose to deal with it.
No one's opinion was asked when we implemented the policy and we are not asking for it now, all we ask is all members who choose to use the platform adhere to the policy.
What is the pain from being banned from the forum? you can still punt, read reviews, read the forum if you are a gold member everything you pay for you still receive.
Our advertisers want the maximum benefit/exposure from their listings on this platform, they do not want appointments going to non-advertisers.
Have you ever thought of lady X who left the industry that might want her privacy, and she might not want to be mentioned or asked about on this platform?
Would it be so hard for a punter to respect her decision in leaving the industry?
Then the best is when a punter says he is good friends for ex-advertiser and wants to know if she is ok and would like her number or whereabouts, now if you are friends why would you not have her number?
Would you not want your favourite lady/ladies her on ESA to profit to the maximum, seeing that she also pays for her advert with her hard-earned money?
Please just be respectful of the policy.
Regards
Antionette
Escort South Africa
Bad mistake.
Fuck I think I'm going to be banned for freeloading.
Reply
Legend
Hover mouse over icons for description
