On 2022-01-16 19:25:09 Teletubby said:
On 2022-01-16 18:40:22 Johnny English said:

The debate is only warming up now, Dictator as we only now going into the short term damage and deaths these synthetic "vaccines" are causing, let alone the short term damage done to humanity's rights and freedoms for a man made virus/pandemic with its 0.0006% death rate. The medium term and long term are yet to come, brace yourself Sheila !


Ah yes, a textbook conspiracy theorist pivot, beautifully executed.

When literally everything you've said is shown to be complete bullshit, quickly turn to some vague and unprovable speculative claim about what's going to happen in the future.

Speculative ? Gain of function lab in Wuhan, financed by Fauci's boys, a pandemic with a death rate of 0.0006%, increasing adverse reactions to the mRNA vaccine, warnings by Nobel prize winner for Medicine, Professor Luc Montagnier, among others, have warned and explained why the medium and long terms effects are going to be catastrophic, mRNA vaccines coming to you soon for the common flu and other illnesses.
Smirk all your like, Tubs, there's big kak coming your way, (just don't blame me for it). Seeing you establishment boys apreciate "my" anecdotes, I'll repeat one for your enjoyment :
"It's the first time in the history that the ineffectiveness of a medicine is blamed on those who haven't taken it."

Yup, speculative, 90% of that is you adding 2 and 2 together and getting 687. (Or just straight up bullshit like "increasing adverse reactions").

And as for Luc Montagnier, well: https://science.thewire.in/the-sciences/luc-montagniers-views-on-covid-vaccines-are-latest-of-his-wrong-vexing-ideas/

" Seeing you establishment boys apreciate "my" anecdotes, I'll repeat one for your enjoyment :
"It's the first time in the history that the ineffectiveness of a medicine is blamed on those who haven't taken it.""

Several things:
1) you clearly don't know what we're talking about when we refer to you using anecdotal evidence (Hint: its not the silly little quotes you litter your posts with, its the way you point to a single data point (eg one person having a heart attack) as being indicative of an overall trend, and the way that you are utterly incapable of distinguishing correlation and causation in those individual data points)
2) As predicated by pretty much everybody, you're ignoring the data JP linked to. Only an absolute moron could look at the graphs showing the difference between vaccinated and unvaccinated death rates and still somehow cling to the idea that the medicine is "ineffective".
3) That's quite a lot of words to basically say "I still don't understand how vaccines/ herd immunity works"

On 2022-01-17 13:01:57 Johnny English said:
dailyexpose.uk/2022/01/16/male-teen-deaths-53-percent-higher-after-covid-vaccination-in-2021/

Well, I thought you were the most statistically illiterate person on the planet, but whoever wrote this garbage has plumbed new depths of idiocy.

1) the weekly figures are barely one standard deviation outside of the normal variation. Absolutely no reason to suspect the variation in the total is not due to the random effects of sampling
2) Showing "total deaths" for this age group without showing those deaths by vaccination status might be the dumbest thing I've seen since this pandemic started.

On 2022-01-17 13:44:12 Teletubby said:
On 2022-01-17 13:01:57 Johnny English said: dailyexpose.uk/2022/01/16/male-teen-deaths-53-percent-higher-after-covid-vaccination-in-2021/

Well, I thought you were the most statistically illiterate person on the planet, but whoever wrote this garbage has plumbed new depths of idiocy.

1) the weekly figures are barely one standard deviation outside of the normal variation. Absolutely no reason to suspect the variation in the total is not due to the random effects of sampling
2) Showing "total deaths" for this age group without showing those deaths by vaccination status might be the dumbest thing I've seen since this pandemic started.

Tubs, lots more coming your way, you may have to revisit your dumbest thing ......

- "vaccine" free

On 2022-01-17 06:52:43 Johnny English said:
with its 0.0006% death rate

You keep throwing that number around and you couldn't be more wrong - where do you get it? There have been 328M COVID cases and 5.54M deaths - that's 1.69% not 0.0006% - gosh you can't even do basic arithmetic.

On 2022-01-17 14:24:34 oraljim said:
On 2022-01-17 06:52:43 Johnny English said: with its 0.0006% death rate
You keep throwing that number around and you couldn't be more wrong - where do you get it? There have been 328M COVID cases and 5.54M deaths - that's 1.69% not 0.0006% - gosh you can't even do basic arithmetic.

Why do you sound so surprised, Jimmy ? You and your buddies have already concluded my limited capacity for numbers and stats (among other disabilities). Maybe you clever boys can correct my basic arithmetic. 8 billion people, 5.3 million deaths = 0.00066% death rate (or 0.00069% if the deaths are now at 5.54 million)

On 2022-01-17 14:32:35 Johnny English said:
Why do you sound so surprised, Jimmy ? You and your buddies have already concluded my limited capacity for numbers and stats (among other disabilities). Maybe you clever boys can correct my basic arithmetic. 8 billion people, 5.3 million deaths = 0.00066% death rate (or 0.00069% if the deaths are now at 5.54 million)

LOL so glad you fell into that trap - I had a feeling that's how you were doing your lying. The "death rate" is not measured against the global population, it's measured against the number of people who have contracted the disease. Just like you don't measure the percentage of people who die from car accidents against the global population but rather against those who drive. Talk about spouting pure bullshit just to try make a point. Anyway it's pointless engaging with you so I will resume lurking and pop my head out when bored again.

On 2022-01-17 14:32:35 Johnny English said:
On 2022-01-17 14:24:34 oraljim said: On 2022-01-17 06:52:43 Johnny English said: with its 0.0006% death rate
You keep throwing that number around and you couldn't be more wrong - where do you get it? There have been 328M COVID cases and 5.54M deaths - that's 1.69% not 0.0006% - gosh you can't even do basic arithmetic.

Why do you sound so surprised, Jimmy ? You and your buddies have already concluded my limited capacity for numbers and stats (among other disabilities). Maybe you clever boys can correct my basic arithmetic. 8 billion people, 5.3 million deaths = 0.00066% death rate (or 0.00069% if the deaths are now at 5.54 million)

Well, that didn't take long. You're back to the dumbest.

Imagine going to your doctor and he tells you you have pancreatic cancer, so you ask him what your chances are and he tells you the survival rate for the population as a whole and not the survival rate for PEOPLE WITH PANCREATIC CANCER. that's how fucking stupid you've just been.