On 2022-02-06 16:25:54 JP82 said:
On 2022-02-06 15:53:05 triton242 said: JP
Well reasoned argument there, except for what you think people do/don't deserve. Not your decision to make, and luckily not how life works either
Again, I think you have missed the point. I haven't just arbitrarly claimed certain people deserve things, nor have I pretended that I have the right to be the one that decides how resources get allocated. What I have done is made an argument showing, on a moral basis, *why* I think resources should be allocated in a certain way. You can disagree if you want but what you need to do to do that successfully is show why my moral reasoning is faulty, not just point to the trivial fact that I am not the one who gets to decide.
(ps when you say "luckily not how life works", I assume you mean "lucky" for the antivaxxer who has chosen to put himself in danger? Cos it seems to me to be not just unlucky but decidedly unfair on the guy who has a heart attack but dies because there aren't any ambulances or hospital beds available)
On 2022-02-06 17:29:15 Churchill said:
JP. 1 the vaccines dont work. 2. The whole thing is over. 3. What dont you get?
On 2022-02-06 17:42:12 Churchill said:
How do you put others at risk when you have stated preiously that these vaccines dont work in stopping getting infected. Sorry but you are retarded.
On 2022-02-06 17:29:15 Churchill said:
JP. 1 the vaccines dont work. 2. The whole thing is over. 3. What dont you get?