On 2022-03-15 14:41:38 Jakeburns78 said:
On 2022-03-15 14:35:08 Nickey Blue said: On 2022-03-15 14:18:35 Kooni said: On 2022-03-15 12:57:02 Boob guy said: No WG will ever admit to it. And only some punters. It just is the reality. Pm me if you know of anyone the does BB or if there are ladies that are super cautious.
Most if not all SP does Bareback with their partners, some have admit to this already.
I personally feel punting is not the "sport" for you, try something like chess, there's a lot less risk involved with about zero changes of getting infected with an std
Love chess its really a game to enjoy and see the character of a person without communication
Haven't played for ages, but used to love playing chess, still have a board that was a 13th birthday present, a long long time ago
Jake
Check out chess.com You play for free against the world anytime... They have tips to refresh your playing skills and optional tournaments
Chess makes me happy
On 2022-03-15 15:47:51 Gretchen said:
I was once working with a WG, she offered a room in her house for ladies to work from. So we decided to do doubles. The first double was one of her regulars. She straight out told me, the guy can't get it up with a condom but he's her regular, he's clean, I must also do it bareback. I'm like, HELL NO. Especially considering the WG house and the WG herself wasn't clean/hygienic (I spend an entire day cleaning that house before I did a booking there) Needless to say, I told the punter from the start that it is his problem that he can't get it up with a condom, therefore forget about having intercourse with me. So we didn't, but he did with her. Same story with the second client she organised for the double booking. I organised a double with my regular client and she went bareback with him to despite the fact that I was using condoms with him. That said, if a WG has a regular client, after a while they discuss bareback. They both tested prior to the bareback booking, and still test each other monthly. Would that be acceptable?
That would only work if you both only have bareback with each other, but there is no way to guarantee that he or you don't have a similar arrangement with other people. Likelihood is that he or you are having bareback somewhere else as well so an infection can happen between the time of testing and when you have sex. Even if you both test immediately prior to the booking there is still a window period wherein for example an HIV infection won't show up on the test. So you or him could gave a negative test but still infect the other. There is no safe way around this in a punter/wg arrangement. By nature of the engagement there is multiple partners involved.
On 2022-03-15 15:58:47 JHB22 said:
On 2022-03-15 15:47:51 Gretchen said: I was once working with a WG, she offered a room in her house for ladies to work from. So we decided to do doubles. The first double was one of her regulars. She straight out told me, the guy can't get it up with a condom but he's her regular, he's clean, I must also do it bareback. I'm like, HELL NO. Especially considering the WG house and the WG herself wasn't clean/hygienic (I spend an entire day cleaning that house before I did a booking there) Needless to say, I told the punter from the start that it is his problem that he can't get it up with a condom, therefore forget about having intercourse with me. So we didn't, but he did with her. Same story with the second client she organised for the double booking. I organised a double with my regular client and she went bareback with him to despite the fact that I was using condoms with him. That said, if a WG has a regular client, after a while they discuss bareback. They both tested prior to the bareback booking, and still test each other monthly. Would that be acceptable?
That would only work if you both only have bareback with each other, but there is no way to guarantee that he or you don't have a similar arrangement with other people. Likelihood is that he or you are having bareback somewhere else as well so an infection can happen between the time of testing and when you have sex. Even if you both test immediately prior to the booking there is still a window period wherein for example an HIV infection won't show up on the test. So you or him could gave a negative test but still infect the other. There is no safe way around this in a punter/wg arrangement. By nature of the engagement there is multiple partners involved.
On 2022-03-15 15:47:51 Gretchen said:
I was once working with a WG, she offered a room in her house for ladies to work from. So we decided to do doubles. The first double was one of her regulars. She straight out told me, the guy can't get it up with a condom but he's her regular, he's clean, I must also do it bareback. I'm like, HELL NO. Especially considering the WG house and the WG herself wasn't clean/hygienic (I spend an entire day cleaning that house before I did a booking there) Needless to say, I told the punter from the start that it is his problem that he can't get it up with a condom, therefore forget about having intercourse with me. So we didn't, but he did with her. Same story with the second client she organised for the double booking. I organised a double with my regular client and she went bareback with him to despite the fact that I was using condoms with him. That said, if a WG has a regular client, after a while they discuss bareback. They both tested prior to the bareback booking, and still test each other monthly. Would that be acceptable?
Totally unacceptable. If she had any respect for you, she wouldn't have gone bb. She doesn't have respect for herself, neither for you or her partner, if she has one.
Nee man
You are just exponentially increasing your risk as you or him take on multiple partners. No test will help you.
The reason this post is going on and on is because people(myself included) are trying to figure out who offers it,so that they can book those WG's,without anyone else knowing that they want the bareback,and they can carry on acting holier than thou in here.
Want ons is mos almal varke.
On 2022-03-15 17:13:22 Forsyth P Jones said:
Let's just cut the BS and call it...
The reason this post is going on and on is because people(myself included) are trying to figure out who offers it,so that they can book those WG's,without anyone else knowing that they want the bareback,and they can carry on acting holier than thou in here.
Want ons is mos almal varke.
Speak for yourself. And how has this thread assisted you so far in that regard? No one has been named and shamed
On 2022-03-15 15:47:51 Gretchen said:
I was once working with a WG, she offered a room in her house for ladies to work from. So we decided to do doubles. The first double was one of her regulars. She straight out told me, the guy can't get it up with a condom but he's her regular, he's clean, I must also do it bareback. I'm like, HELL NO. Especially considering the WG house and the WG herself wasn't clean/hygienic (I spend an entire day cleaning that house before I did a booking there) Needless to say, I told the punter from the start that it is his problem that he can't get it up with a condom, therefore forget about having intercourse with me. So we didn't, but he did with her. Same story with the second client she organised for the double booking. I organised a double with my regular client and she went bareback with him to despite the fact that I was using condoms with him. That said, if a WG has a regular client, after a while they discuss bareback. They both tested prior to the bareback booking, and still test each other monthly. Would that be acceptable?
You sound curious and open to the idea under the "right" conditions.
I always use condom. Yet, still often worry whether something has not gone wrong. Often during the deed, i worry that condom might break (happened twice, but fortunately was clean after testing). But those 2 incidents spooks me.
Legend
Hover mouse over icons for description
