#Don'tPayBackTheMoneyAngie

John must just take a walk.

@Angie. Fuck this guy. So hard his dick breaks

[QUOTE;4442624;Walker john] Hi All

I booked a traveling service provider Angie while in Pe paid her via eft as I don't carry large sums of cash. booking was cancelled due to past history between us she did say she would refund me but am still awaiting the refund.

Tried contacting her and my numbers are all blocked.

Need some advice on the matter [/QUOTE

So you pay someone upfront although you have issues.
Sorry but this sounds suspicious.
Cash is king

Adding another community members perspective to the mix:

Deceiving a girl who has "blocked" you into letting you into her apartment is not acceptable. - very creepy sinister vibes.

I'd take the financial loss as your penance and move on. Be a better man next time.

If she's blocked you, banned you. Have some respect and leave her alone. You have lost her consent!

Melany u brave asking a question like that. Don't change that. Many people would rather not ask and not know what shortened abbreviation stands for. Dude what were u thinking not letting the wg know who u were. Hopefully both u and wg can come up with an agreement to sort out problem.

Angie... Why am I not surprised. Dodgy thang that one.

I'm fairly new here and I have to say, this topic is pretty much interesting as this is a situation that puts a man in an extreme situation. The question is, was the bareback request made before the funds were transferred to Angie or after Angie received the funds? Thing is, the problem seemed to be the bareback request here. So if Angie was asked/given the option of bareback or nothing why did she even proceed with taking funds from the guy. As soon as the guy mentioned something wasn't comfortable with why didn't she politely just say sorry I don't offer such services and then return the funds if the funds were already on her end? Like this gives scammer vibes on Angie's part because to her it seems like it's the money that she was interested in from the get go.

On 2023-11-06 07:55:15 SolCandy said:
I'm fairly new here and I have to say, this topic is pretty much interesting as this is a situation that puts a man in an extreme situation. The question is, was the bareback request made before the funds were transferred to Angie or after Angie received the funds? Thing is, the problem seemed to be the bareback request here. So if Angie was asked/given the option of bareback or nothing why did she even proceed with taking funds from the guy. As soon as the guy mentioned something wasn't comfortable with why didn't she politely just say sorry I don't offer such services and then return the funds if the funds were already on her end? Like this gives scammer vibes on Angie's part because to her it seems like it's the money that she was interested in from the get go.

What shit are you talking here?

Did you learn to read at school?

And should we discuss your intent of a post that speaks to stirring kaka instead of adding something worthy of consideration?

RB.

Zuma got away with it, why are we forcing Angie to pay back daa maaar knee


Johnny stop walking, buy a car......after your refund

On 2023-11-06 07:36:28 Baziel said:
Angie... Why am I not surprised. Dodgy thang that one.

...and you are a shit stirrer that needs to be held accountable for spreading dangerous rumors about SP's and their offerings putting them on their backfooting, at risk and open to abuse and discrimination without cause or proof of the allegations you spread.

You should be banned from this forum.

RB.