On 2024-01-11 11:54:38 JackParrow69 said:
On 2024-01-11 11:44:59 JHB22 said: On 2024-01-11 10:42:29 Arhwen said: The people who actually have issues with verification are the problematic people in my opinion. It's not like ESA will share id details with ladies if you can pay via bank account for your GM it the same thing because bank payments come from Mr. Or Ms so and so.
It's not about wg's having your ID, it's about your details being stored on a sex site data base which can easily be leaked into the public even if not by ESA but by a hacker, it happens all the time. It's really not rocket science what the risks are. And therefore a lot of us pay with crypto and some deposit at the atm. The trouble makers really can't give a fuck, they have nothing to loose it seems. But some of us do value our privacy and discretion.
I could not have said it better.
Okay, maybe I could but no need. You said what needs to be said.
Can see the troublemakers neh. Can trust the usual to derail an otherwise very useful thread. As it said, "common sense isn't so common", lol.
Peace out.
JP69
On 2024-01-11 13:36:12 DickRich2 said:
Alright folks, let us return this thread to peace. It was just a suggestion, I think the counterpoints are received. We wouldn't want IDs submitted as punters for privacy reasons.
On 2024-01-11 15:09:12 kevman said:
Is this just a users' discussion or is esa open to implementing any of these requests?
On 2024-01-11 13:27:48 KICKASS said:
If we can maybe take them out more often to discuss life it's self.lmao