Ah by Ken, read your own words... you stated clearly there is no choice, there was no exceptions made.

All refusals of service can be boiled down to a form of discrimination if you want to push it that far... Executive only, that's Elitism isn't it...

Their body their choice, its that simple... anything else is forcing them to do things they don't want with their body and that is rape.

On 2015-08-28 17:22:29 deamonza said:
On 2015-08-27 13:07:
Never have I heard the argument for indentured slavery put so eloquently ! Well said sir. I wish someone could remind the Indians of that when they comment about ....

Sir, if I had substituted your ethnic group for the word "Indians" in your post above , you would be highly affronted won't you now?

Sir, I scorn the counterfeit sentiment offered in your remark.

Is it really important?

On 2015-08-31 17:27:21 Ben Layden said:
On 2015-08-28 17:22:29 deamonza said: On 2015-08-27 13:07:
Never have I heard the argument for indentured slavery put so eloquently ! Well said sir. I wish someone could remind the Indians of that when they comment about ....

Sir, if I had substituted your ethnic group for the word "Indians" in your post above , you would be highly affronted won't you now?

Sir, I scorn the counterfeit sentiment offered in your remark.

It was certainly not the most tactful manner of putting it to get my point across, on that I can agree. That being said, Kev's views on this subject wind me up to the point I write first and think later.

The analogy I believe is correct, the method of phrasing perhaps not.

@deamonza - I think you get all wound up because you actually think this is a dating site. You and so many others think that when a WG sees you it's because they like you. That this is not a transaction. I call it what it is all day every day.

Seeing "executives" only is not discriminatory (elitist yes, but all races have an opportunity to be an executive. It's not based on skin color. This is actually quite simple. Don't know why you didn't get that.

Oh yes, Kev got you wound up!!!

And this thread is still- Oh look, a butterfly... Yawn.

This topic is really getting old. I mean really... My 2c (worth as much as a fart in a tornado).

@Kev, a simple question. Let's say hypothetically that you decide you want to up the income and decide to become a gigolo. Your flavour is career women in their 30's and 40's. A Mr.X, a happily married dad of two has a penchant for men, and sees your profile. He contacts you and you say no-no, aint nothing is going up my chute, as you do not cater for that.

Gently at first say sorry bud, but Mr. X continues. Then the name calling starts... Insults... You are a homophobe... Again you state that it is not your thing. You might have nothing against him, or gay men in general. Just not your flavour... And that is repeated over and over and over and over again.

So, my question is, if the above hypothetical situation were a reality, would your argument about SP's not being selective still hold?

Now as I understood from ROAR, it basically means that the SP has the right to refuse anybody. What would make the scenario above different to what you are stating? And no, I specifically did not use race at all, but the scenario above is also quite descriptive of the ROAR policy, as it, in context, is very similar.

Ok, now everybody have a great day!

May it sound like thunder where your cattle is grazing!!

On 2015-09-01 10:36:12 NotSoShyKev said:
@deamonza - I think you get all wound up because you actually think this is a dating site. You and so many others think that when a WG sees you it's because they like you.

Hahahaha, this has to be the funniest thing I have heard in a few months. No, I have not confused this with a dating site, I am very clear that this is pay for play and I have no illusions about whether I am "liked"...

What you have failed to understand is my objection to the idea that I am buying a person. Yes, I am buying a service, a service that is agreed to by both parties. The minute that agreement is not there then that is something else, the minute her choices are violated that is something else.

I cannot and will not put my wants over a womans choice... Its why I don't go to houses, don't chose ladies from a stable. I only chose ladies that are completely independent and therefore have full and free choice to accept the pay for play bookings. Anything else where a woman does not have to the right to chose her clients, be it by economics, race, creed, build or whatever is tantamount to slavery as far as I am concerned.

My demand for pussy does not overrule her right to choose who has access no matter if there is money involved.

@Witwolf82 - you had me thinking and @deamonza - if I was to write your report card I would say "has improved. Reading skills have improved and it shows in the new argument". Just kidding @deamonza no harm intended.

For all of us here the one thing that we cannot change is our race. No matter what you do bleach or tan you remain whatever race you are. For this only reason I as a black person will always feel offended when my skin colour excludes me from anything. Now lets be honest, if we are to tally the inclusions and exclusions certain races win big time. It is because of this that certain races will always be oblivious to the privileges that they get just from virtue of being that race. Yes it's not your fault; however, do not knock down what I go through when you haven't walked a day in my life. Note that I represent only myself and not my entire race as I am just that - an individual.

@deamonza - I think you should rethink your reasons for not going to a "house". There are many reasons why women end up at these houses...one being safety in numbers and the other being just a place to work from. If you one needs to ply their trade in the northern suburbs and cannot afford an apartment then a house is an easy option.

Anyway happy punting gents

@Kev... that's not true. Michael Jackson changed his race... so there !

My house rules are there for a reason... I can tell you of at least one house that takes at least half of the girls earning, as I am an outbooker they are in reality copping 50% for doing nothing.
It certainly does not limit my punts in the least, there are more then enough "house" girls who will take an after hours side booking...

Only the precious punda getting properly plundered gets paid ! its a rule !

And there was never any offense taken... I survived basics with the SANDF, there isn't a single insult that I haven't heard at least 10 times from a short arsed PTI.

"... that's not true. Michael Jackson changed his race..."

Deamonza, lol. That's priceless. Good one.

Wow, I'm getting to laugh a lot today. You, Arhwen and Russian Bridgitte have had me rolling around on the floor today.