On 2016-01-28 19:30:46 iamfunluva said:
@mujahid, My theory is that okes don't want other punters and ladies to know they slaan'd a lekker lady of colour out of fear they will be branded and not allowed to see certain ladies again due to ROAR policies

Yesterday there was a bruising verbal exchange between one popular lady of color and one avid forum participant over a difference in political views.
Save to say some soiled laundry was aired in public and a few skeletons came tumbling out the closet.
But the same esteemed gentleman who admitted carnally crossing the color line is openly flirting with one famous'ROAR' WG on the other thread and she seems all besotted by his attention.

Well guess i am wrong than Tizz
That's why it's called a theory and not a fact :-)

On 2016-01-28 19:30:46 iamfunluva said:
@mujahid, My theory is that okes don't want other punters and ladies to know they slaan'd a lekker lady of colour out of fear they will be branded and not allowed to see certain ladies again due to ROAR policies

And the winner is.... :D

On 2016-01-28 20:09:23 iamfunluva said:
That's why it's called a theory and not a fact :-)

youtu.be/U6zWjUhfj-M

Lol classic Monty

On 2016-01-28 20:09:23 iamfunluva said:
Well guess i am wrong than Tizz
That's why it's called a theory and not a fact :-)

I unreservedly buy into that theory notwithstanding.

There are 2 ladies of colour not that it matters but since you guys feel so strongly about it why not rate ethnic ladies cause their are some stunning ones with Stella reviews ;)

Is this not because there is more white males using the site than their black counterparts?

The top 10 / top 100 are not racially based, but determined from the ratings given to them by Gold Members only.

Best not to complain if you not prepare to pay to be gold member. Pay your subs, rate the ladies you visit and nothing will stop them from appearing on the list. There are a lot of ladies (from all races) that should be in the Top 10 / 100 list but unfortunately for them they are mostly rated by non-Gold Members and therefor the ratings does not count towards the Top 10 / 100 listings

Punters get gold membership for different reasons. I do not think giving a WG - 5 points is one of them. Correct me if I'm wrong. Has anyone ever paid just to give a girl 5 points? Let us know.

If my statement holds true then I see no reason why ESA does not allow non-gold members to give points. After all you cannot give a negative score and if your review is allowed then surely you should be able to rate.

I am an occasional Gold Member - I load up for a month here and there. As I am an occasional punter I will load up gold membership only when I want to review a prospect fully, or there are some new pics or vids that get me interested.

I think allowing ratings from non-gold members will change the top 10. I could be wrong though, maybe it's just a function of certain people always review and others don't.

Still though, top 10 is a good indication of the level service rendered. There are loads of ladies that just do get the GOLD Member review and this should not impact on how they are ultimately perceived.

Since you are all paying for advertising you should all have an equal opportunity to be in the TOP 10. The current situation is flawed and ESA should level the playing field. Yes some will say but what about the non-forum members that visit the ladies etc.

Well, allow each advertiser to get points from any forum member as a start.