It is just an attempt to intimidate her, companies and even attorneys do this sort of thing all the time.

Restraint of Trade in this game is laughable to say the least, they would have to compensate her financially for the said restraint period at least if they were serious about enforcing it. They're fucked up stupid for even mentioning it lol

On 2024-09-09 15:34:57 balasbak said:
As far as I am aware, a Court cannot enforce a contract that would amount in the first instance to conduct which is illegal ...

Correct. Contra boner mores.

That "restraint of trade" would not stand up in any court, that is if they are going to get any court to even take their case.

It would be the same as one cat burglars gets another burglars to sign a Restraint of Trade that he will not commit any burglaries in the same area as the other.

It's not the legal restraint of trade they refer to as we all understand.

Most venue's "pay" in some form or another for protection to a third party. That is why they do not get raided.

This is what they are worried about and the "restraint of trade" is applied by the THIRD PARTY!

FEAR!!!! Welcome to the RSA!

On 2024-09-09 16:31:44 Mex said:
On 2024-09-09 15:34:57 balasbak said: As far as I am aware, a Court cannot enforce a contract that would amount in the first instance to conduct which is illegal ...
Correct. Contra boner mores.

Boner....had me in stitches!

On 2024-09-09 17:22:14 joka62 said:
It's not the legal restraint of trade they refer to as we all understand.

Most venue's "pay" in some form or another for protection to a third party. That is why they do not get raided.

This is what they are worried about and the "restraint of trade" is applied by the THIRD PARTY!

FEAR!!!! Welcome to the RSA!

Protection Money ? Nah I think not, maybe a few do but most don't

Contra boner mores just made my night.

I just want to know what makes the venue owner think that they own PTA to tell someone that they can't work in the area. I would have told them too fuck off.

Further more I would have told them to too court because they might be a registered massage venue but normal massage spas don't do extras do would have loved to see how that went down in court.

Some of these owners have mob mentality. There are only 2 venue owners on this site who has won my respect who I take my hat off too. The owner of massage inc and the venue I use to work from. The rest either exploit their ladies or treat them like shit.

With this said I have not met all venue owners but I have met a number of them and I know a lot of ladies in this industry.

Anything that goes to court becomes public. This industry and the players on all sides want their deeds to remain private. Therefore the industry secrecy will be exposed when one goes to court.

There are WG and Punters who obviously don't care but the large majority have anonymity as the foremost requirement in engagements, this is what then allows the bullying and extortion to manifest. Wouldn't trade anonymity for anything, many have a lot more to loose than gain if our deeds came out in one way or another.

Nonetheless, fuck the bullies