On 2017-06-12 17:43:27 BOOBS53 said:
Ladies are blamed and shamed if they cross the line ... why not the punters if they cross the line ... let be fair !!!
On 2017-06-12 17:47:42 Climax said:
If his old usernames and the one he used to pm natasha is named, will that be proof enough that maybe just maybe this "popular girl" gave it up for +5?
On 2017-06-12 17:43:27 BOOBS53 said:
Ladies are blamed and shamed if they cross the line ... why not the punters if they cross the line ... lets be fair !!!
On 2017-06-12 17:52:21 Veronica Franco said:
On 2017-06-12 17:47:42 Climax said: If his old usernames and the one he used to pm natasha is named, will that be proof enough that maybe just maybe this "popular girl" gave it up for +5?
That would be difficult to prove babe. They don't always do it. But i do agree that all ratings by said client should be made 'null and void' because they tarnish the rating system for both legitimate punters and honest wgs.
On 2017-06-12 17:47:42 Climax said:
If his old usernames and the one he used to pm natasha is named, will that be proof enough that maybe just maybe this "popular girl" gave it up for +5?
On 2017-06-12 18:42:25 Sultry Indian Jiah said:
On 2017-06-12 17:47:42 Climax said: If his old usernames and the one he used to pm natasha is named, will that be proof enough that maybe just maybe this "popular girl" gave it up for +5?
Nah seriously none if those ladies would have done it for a +5. Guy is seriously not all that . The ladies most probably would have added a couple of R100's to their fee.
On 2017-06-12 18:00:06 Vanilla said:
On 2017-06-12 17:43:27 BOOBS53 said: Ladies are blamed and shamed if they cross the line ... why not the punters if they cross the line ... lets be fair !!!
I totally agree with you Boobs53
Also stunts like this are not good for our image, some of us go all out to please our clients hence we have so many regulars but when people see things like this they start doubting us.