Navigation
![]( "A member of ESA for less than a year")
![]( "A member of ESA between a year and five years")
![]( "A member of ESA for more than five years, but less than 10 years")
![]( "A member of ESA for more than 10 years")
![]( "Gold Member")
![]( "ESA staff met this punter in person")
![]( "A respected member of the community, with consistent helpful posts")
![]( "One of our Wicked Wendesday Winners")
![]( "Directly helps ESA in the recruitement of new advertisers")
![]( "Donated to Charity")
![]( "Is the owner/manager of a venue advertising on ESA")
![]( "Part of the ESA Photography Team")
![]( "Received the Punter Of the Year Award")
Hover mouse over icons for description
-
Re: **New PICS IN MY PG**
Posted: 2019-09-20 07:09:04
What are the obvious reasons for monitoring selfies? I mean we already see or have seen full close up spread pussies, finger or dildo insertions, dick sucking pics etc. So what could possibly need to be monitored when it comes to ladies posting selfies?
Years ago ESA had a stance that no pussy pics were allowed. That eventually changed too.
On 2019-09-19 14:59:48 ESA Forum Admin said:
Dear LoveAgoodone
ESA has always had to approve selfies for obvious reasons.
Matt
Esa Supp
What are the obvious reasons for monitoring selfies? I mean we already see or have seen full close up spread pussies, finger or dildo insertions, dick sucking pics etc. So what could possibly need to be monitored when it comes to ladies posting selfies?
Years ago ESA had a stance that no pussy pics were allowed. That eventually changed too.
Reply
Legend
Hover mouse over icons for description
For the best browsing experience, rotate your tablet horizontal.