On 2024-07-24 11:36:48 Plumtree said:
I have a weird fetish where I go WG's with bad reviews. 8/10 times you'll find that the bad review makes her aware of the bad service and you'll be in for a treat as she tries to redeem herself! Anyone else have this mindset!?

If that's your logic, then one would expect that after the first, or maybe even second or third negative review she would have tried to redeem herself, yet these girls continue giving kak service so your argument is flawed. I think this has more to do with your own insecurities, going to a girl that's not so great makes you feel better than going to a 5 star girl where you probably don't feel worthy. Also the reason some guys can never book a girl that looks stunning, they don't feel worthy.

Has anyone else noticed that as soon as there is any tiny bit of negative feedback in a review, a couple of positive reviews come out of nowhere ion the same day. Like the lady has a couple of fake punter accounts.

However, to me most negative reviews don't have the appeal and magic of those legendary longform reviews we've seen from certain punters.

Personally my fetish is reading bad restaurant reviews. This one by the late A.A. Gill is an absolute classic.

"It's painted a shiny, distressed dung brown. The cramped tables are set with labially pink cloths, which give it a colonic appeal and the awkward sense that you might be a suppository. In the middle of the room is a stubby stove that also looks vaguely proctological."

Read on: www.vanityfair.com/style/2011/04/lami-louis-201104

At a loss for words. So unique and sexual hahaha:D

On 2024-07-25 10:11:24 Tacotom said:


"It's painted a shiny, distressed dung brown. The cramped tables are set with labially pink cloths, which give it a colonic appeal and the awkward sense that you might be a suppository. In the middle of the room is a stubby stove that also looks vaguely proctological."

Read on: www.vanityfair.com/style/2011/04/lami-louis-201104

On 2024-07-25 07:59:56 landy said:
OK, help me out here guys

Looking at Plumtrees profile (coz you can do that, you know) none of his reviews in the previous six months have been after with a SP who has previously received a negative review.

So either he has bullshitted about his fetish (which I really dont give a shit about) OR that he doesnt review them after

So which part did I did not understand or not read correctly

If you did not give a shit about it, why do you then comment on it.

So which part did I did not understand or not read correctly

If that's your logic, then one would expect that after the first, or maybe even second or third negative review she would have tried to redeem herself, yet these girls continue giving kak service so your argument is flawed. I think this has more to do with your own insecurities, going to a girl that's not so great makes you feel better than going to a 5 star girl where you probably don't feel worthy. Also the reason some guys can never book a girl that looks stunning, they don't feel worthy. [/QUOTE]

This is not a dating site and with that said you can book the girl with the highest rates and reviews and she wil treat u exactly the same as any other guy that books her. Even if u dont feel worthy. Its the coliur of your money. They not seeing u to date u.
Its not about looks even cause there are some real ugly guys that books girls. Like if it wasnt for working girls they would have popye forarms already.

So ricky tan if he wants to book girls with bad reviews then let him do what makes him happy. Where do u come in to judge his short commings if there even is any.
And he actualy has a point where a girl wil learn and better herself.