Navigation
![]( "A member of ESA for less than a year")
![]( "A member of ESA between a year and five years")
![]( "A member of ESA for more than five years, but less than 10 years")
![]( "A member of ESA for more than 10 years")
![]( "Gold Member")
![]( "ESA staff met this punter in person")
![]( "A respected member of the community, with consistent helpful posts")
![]( "One of our Wicked Wendesday Winners")
![]( "Directly helps ESA in the recruitement of new advertisers")
![]( "Donated to Charity")
![]( "Is the owner/manager of a venue advertising on ESA")
![]( "Part of the ESA Photography Team")
![]( "Received the Punter Of the Year Award")
Hover mouse over icons for description
-
Is it just me?
Posted: 2015-11-17 07:30:12
I would like to hear your views ( Punters & WG's) on the subject of WG not MG not revealing there "assets" on their profiles - I get the issue of WG not showing their face . No issue there BUT a profile with no pics of titis $ bare bum !!!!! And on top of it all few reviews (some of whitch appear let's say manufactured) ...... Me I just move on
-
Re: Is it just me?
Posted: 2015-11-17 10:56:55
Yip, just keep moving moving moving. The devil is in the details. I've learnt with these pics that if they're obscure, blurred or covered, then there's something hidden which you won't like when you see it. Paid the school fees, now I move on.
-
Re: Is it just me?
Posted: 2015-11-17 19:45:58
Whilst I understand the many reasons behind not showing faces, I must be honest -- any lady who *does* show her face gets my full attention to each and every photograph in her portfolio, regardless of whether I find her attractive or not, and even if it is just one set, or one photograph in a set.
I see my actions as a fitting tribute to the fact that these ladies have made a commitment (and personal sacrifice) to the industry, and who do not do things in half measures.
That does not mean that I would not book a lady who does not show her face, it merely means that a lady who does has so many more chances of being booked, by me or many others.
I see my actions as a fitting tribute to the fact that these ladies have made a commitment (and personal sacrifice) to the industry, and who do not do things in half measures.
That does not mean that I would not book a lady who does not show her face, it merely means that a lady who does has so many more chances of being booked, by me or many others.
-
Re: Is it just me?
Posted: 2015-11-17 20:42:15
Most of us ladies do have families. Some don't know others do. It's all about choice. So on behalf of most lady's please respect our choices not to show our faces. Regards Monika
-
Re: Is it just me?
Posted: 2015-11-17 20:43:51
I don't believe a wg has to show everything but I do believe a teaser should be shown in our photos. Eg) We should at least show cleavage, legs, the shape of your ass, etc as in to give the client an idea as in to what he is looking forward to. It is a wg choice as to whether she wants to show more.
-
Re: Is it just me?
Posted: 2015-11-17 20:45:28
Well said savanna
-
Re: Is it just me?
Posted: 2015-11-17 22:52:57
I understand the not showing the face.
I respect freedom of of a WG to chose to show or not show . Conversely respect my freedom to choose to "skip" any WG who does not show at least her breasts & bum
Xxxx
On 2015-11-17 20:43:51 Savanna said:
I don't believe a wg has to show everything but I do believe a teaser should be shown in our photos. Eg) We should at least show cleavage, legs, the shape of your ass, etc as in to give the client an idea as in to what he is looking forward to. It is a wg choice as to whether she wants to show more.
I understand the not showing the face.
I respect freedom of of a WG to chose to show or not show . Conversely respect my freedom to choose to "skip" any WG who does not show at least her breasts & bum
Xxxx
Reply
Legend
Hover mouse over icons for description
For the best browsing experience, rotate your tablet horizontal.