Navigation
![]( "A member of ESA for less than a year")
![]( "A member of ESA between a year and five years")
![]( "A member of ESA for more than five years, but less than 10 years")
![]( "A member of ESA for more than 10 years")
![]( "Gold Member")
![]( "ESA staff met this punter in person")
![]( "A respected member of the community, with consistent helpful posts")
![]( "One of our Wicked Wendesday Winners")
![]( "Directly helps ESA in the recruitement of new advertisers")
![]( "Donated to Charity")
![]( "Is the owner/manager of a venue advertising on ESA")
![]( "Part of the ESA Photography Team")
![]( "Received the Punter Of the Year Award")
Hover mouse over icons for description
-
Re: To the Punters
Posted: 2015-10-03 15:58:32
Been with all types. My default preference is perfect curvy. There was a russian on esa many years ago, Uma Thurman look alike who had the perfect 10/10 curvy figure.
I been with fat chicks but i dont like flabby wobbly fat. Stywe vet is better for my.
I also dont like rake thin bony girls with no tits becoz it feels like screwing a skeleton.
On the other hand I love a pretty or cute face on any body type.
I been with fat chicks but i dont like flabby wobbly fat. Stywe vet is better for my.
I also dont like rake thin bony girls with no tits becoz it feels like screwing a skeleton.
On the other hand I love a pretty or cute face on any body type.
-
Re: To the Punters
Posted: 2015-10-03 17:42:40
Yes, weight does affect choice.
I prefer chubby (not overweight) chicks who are between 1.50m and 1.6m tall. I find them to be very comfortable to handle.
I prefer chubby (not overweight) chicks who are between 1.50m and 1.6m tall. I find them to be very comfortable to handle.
Reply
Legend
Hover mouse over icons for description
For the best browsing experience, rotate your tablet horizontal.