NaughtyMandy – I just wish to compliment you on your response which I think is reasonable logical counter statement – very professional, I am impressed.

Ben Layden – I don’t foresee any problems with your suggestion.

First – good suggestion

End of the day, aren’t we here to help each other, Economics 101 supply and demand supports each other

Agree with Hardcoldtruth - well put. A full house of 5's must be when you leave thinking that you are going to come back many time - was awesome. I fall into the trap of confusing great looks with service and attitude.

Also agree with Mandy - the remarks should be used to raise positives and negatives. This helps the wg to improve & identify what is appreciated.

The last couple of punts, I have found that the wg's have got a into a routine. Its not exectly rushed or clinical - but its also not spontaneously being pleasured and pleasuring. Maybe its just because its late afternoon & I'm like the 5th visitor. I have left satisfied but not exillerated. Suppose a 3 or a 4. But because I found the babe to be hot - would probably give a 5 - which is not really what the system is about.

We should really think about the punt before reviewing, maybe even do it he next day, so that we do point out the goods and bads. And regardless of the consequences tell the
Hardcoldtruth.

As for Ben's idea - on freebies thay can review as they see fit. But while I'm paying - as they say "keep the customer satisfied".

Thank you Peter_P and DayRider for understanding.
Also thank to Ben Layden for understanding that sometimes we do not get "ideal" punters. However I don't think a punter review system will work. A lot of punters do not reveal who they are, and worse, they might lie...

NM