Dear ESA,

Once again I am experiencing backlash from an SP because I didn't leave a glowing 5/5 review. My review of shemale Nikki was honest and fair but obviously she didn't like the negative press so she not only started blowing up my WhatsApp with all sorts of vitriol, but she's started making false claims about me. This is not an uncommon thing with the reviews. I have a suggestion for how to improve this.

When a punter submits a review, rather than displaying the punter's name in the review, display a random number (so that other posts can refer to a specific review) thus making the review "anonymous". Only ESA admin can see who the actual real poster was, in case the SP wants to lodge a complaint - then ESA can deal with the punter and the SP in private, and avoid bickering in the public forum.

I realize this would make it harder for us punters to follow certain reviewers whom we trust but I feel like that is a small price to pay.

Dear, oraljim.

This is the reason you have an alias, if you shared your alias with a SP or another punter we can not help you with that.

Creating a number would be the same as your alias, the advertiser would then just attack number "10" for instance, you would know it's your review and still feel attacked by the SP, we fail to see the logic in giving the review another alias.

By given the review another alias would take away from reliable punter and their reviews as no one will know who the review is from.

You shared your alias with the SP which is not the way to do this, hence the alias so you are anonymous.


Regards
ESA Admin

Assumption is the mother of all f-ups. I never shared my alias with the SP in question at all. Never even mentioned ESA at all during the session or after. But if she's only seen 1 person today it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out who left the review. I also think you misunderstood what I was suggesting. But it is obvious you are not receptive to new ideas so I'll just shut up and stop wasting yours and my time. Thanks.

@oraljim - A suggestion. "Delayed Reviews"
I never post the review in the week or even month that i made the booking. This eliminates what you are now experiencing.

Dear oraljim.

You too are assuming we are receptive to new suggestions... just to name one example of us NOT being receptive, you now have a gold members forum.

You also do not address any of our reasons for not doing what you are suggesting and it seems the only way you would be pleased is if we did what you suggested.

Punters do not necessarily review on the same day they had the booking, some punters review weeks or even months after so who she saw on the day is irrelevant, she can also only be harassing you if you do not have a punter's phone, you leave the doors wide open for personal engagement when you interact with an SP on your number.

I can not put a number to how many times we advise punters to use a punter phone and not your personal phone, unfortunately, this one is on you alone.

Regard
ESA Support

Where do you apply for a punter's phone?

On 2024-07-25 13:55:47 Chris31 said:
Where do you apply for a punter's phone?

In the Contact Us section at the bottom section of the page

On 2024-07-25 13:55:47 Chris31 said:
Where do you apply for a punter's phone?

Two mistakes he made.

On 2024-07-25 13:55:47 Chris31 said:
Where do you apply for a punter's phone?

Just go to pepstores. Ask one of the staff u want to apply for a punter phone

Possibly Oraljim is suggesting that each review post generates a new random number. So for example, No 10 is not associated with Oraljim only and next time the same punter posts a review, the number could be 1939 or any random number.

I am just offering a different view of the initial post, not necessarily I am endorsing it.

My 10c