Please feel free to correct me if I’m wrong, I have read some really destructive and unproductive reviews and I thought a review should be to comment on the following
1 Service, was it good or bad.
2. Premises, is it safe or not.
3. Attitude, good or bad
3. Overall experience, from start to finish.
Stuff like, you did not click or you did not like her look, stretch-marks or hanging tits, should not be put on a review,
like “ she looked hot in her clothing when I arrived but when I came the shower there was a 70 year old hag lying on the bed” WTF ???? why was this allowed?????
There is NO NEED for this ugliness!
“Beauty is in the eye of the beholder” and just cause you did not click does not mean that she does not click with every other punter out there.
So in my opinion a review should be reviewed by ESA and edited first before it just goes up and hurts a woman’s livelihood!
As long as you got a good service and you were safe …….NOTHING else matters!
I am sure I speak for every WG out there….. PLEASE don’t be ugly! Please do it in a respectful manner!

@Shelley...I couldn't agree with u more!! Lovies M Ruby

I agree! I don't have many reviews but they are respectful!

Respect is paramount but i can't see what the problem is if a punter states, "we didn't click", as it happens from time to time.
Basically, i see it as a diplomatic way of saying, "although the lady has good reviews, "she didn't do it for me" (maybe it's because we didn't click, could even be me?). Can't see how that is disrespectful.

@pumping.. Exactly!!Give your input not insult.. Lovies M Ruby

I mostly agree. I think reviews should always be respectful but I do think that including aspects of physical appearance is important, especially if the photos are misleading. Similarly I think its important to say if you didn't "click"- because believe it or not, for a lot of guys the experience isn't only physical. The upside is that not clicking with certain reviewers may very well be a plus point.

I have to say that it has been a challenge for me post a review while being considerate of not ruining the future livelihood of the lady in question. I thought about it and took a stance last year that I would not post a review where the lady was just overall average. I thus only review ladies that are either standouts or disasters. So, I probably now post on average a review only once every three to four visits.

As a punter that gets value from the forum, I feel it my duty to praise the virtues of the great experiences as well as the nightmares of the disasters.

if I do not "click" with a lady or am disappointed that her body or looks do not match her pictures, but is not dramatic, then I rather do not review. In that way, my personal subjectivity does not hurt the lady's future prospects. But where I do review, I am equally not shy of raising improvement areas but always try and do it in a respectful manner.

A point worth noting that that it is important when giving marks, to provide context to assist others eg. No point raising privacy as 3 and then not explaining that was just because you have to go through a security boom, or bumped into another punter, or bumped into the lady's granny. So, it is all relative as some punters don't mind bumping into others so that 3 is less alarming than bumping into the granny.

Last thing is that beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I have come away from visits to some stunners feeling very disenchanted as the lady had a really crappy attitude or personality. Personally for me, the biggest turn-off for me (body being secondary but within reason) is a lady that has a bad or arrogant attitude.

As a closing point, so that I don't set myself up for disappointment is that I will not visit any lady that does not show a material portion of her body. As I see it, if you have it, flaunt it and promote it for fussy buggers like me.

I agree some of the reviews are somewhat harsh but if the pics are misleading or she offers one thing and provides another then she has caused it on herself!

If it can't be said on the review section then it would get splashed on the open forum which probably is worse

HelloPeter has both smiley faces and frowns. Yes, this is a lady's business and her livelihood.

However, the top ladies learn from reviews (and mistakes they may have made) and improve their offering and like a normal well run business their business grows.

Here a lady has the option to respond to a review, some do so with grace and others grab a spade or some even hire an excavator and dig a bigger hole.

Most clients in a business can discern between a real complaint and a false or unjustified complaint. Looking at reviews on this site punters that know a lady will jump in quickly to her defense or even question a blatant self review.

I take some reviews with a load of salt but there are view punters with whom I concur and if one of them were to downrate a lady I would avoid her, as far as some other reviewers downrating it also makes me tend to look more closely and consider the lady more carefully.

Money spent on a great experience does not hurt, money wasted on a poor experience amplifies the bad experience and I for one would rather be warned than sad especially with all the scamsters that change their names regularly.

All ESA needs to start off with is like restricting who can post and comment in that section. For example, they can start off by only allowing members with 100 posts and above to comment. This way a viewer can identify who the ACTIVE poster is and find out if the post has any credible info or possible BS.

This is not rocket science ESA !