On 2024-09-14 11:05:53 FMS said:
In all of that, considering the attorney then has to possibly appoint an advocate for certain cases to be represented in the higher courts....does "winning" play any role in choice of attorney and advocate appointed?
RB.
"Winning" is obviously the objective. As it is in all aspects of life.
However there are numerous ways to "win" in the legal world.
Stalingrad tactics, while costly, are effective and often cause the plaintiff to forget about the matter.
Negotiating a settlement or arbitration is often quick and relatively cheap, certainly cheaper than going to trial.
With regards to advocates the right attorney for the matter will know the right advocate for the matter.
And certain advocates also do pro-bono or pro-amico work if they believe it is in the interests of justice.
Not all legal professionals are only out to make a quick buck.
On 2024-09-13 20:22:05 Rachel said:
On 2024-08-02 20:35:21
...And just one more funny thing I wanted to point out, wrt the poster who commented saying that they even haggle with their lawyers over pricing, my god man what are you saying here?! I just had to catch a giggle at that one, I cant think of a better way to make even your own lawyer hate you. But boy do I want to see your divorce agreement - must be an all out laugh riot!! Lol.
On 2024-09-16 08:41:03 styffrichard said:
...
2) there is competition from new angles like online sites where students can place ads stating they are looking for an "arrangement". There is your serious competition - some 22 years old "flower-girl" art student is quite appealing
On 2024-08-04 22:16:40 J_J said:
Sorry N4P but most of what you said in your last paragraph is a load of BS