On 2018-04-12 15:42:33 gemini7 said:
Actually, government is the largest owner of land and property in SA.

These properties include : houses, buildings, farms, and other structures.

And it just so happens that most of these properties are vacant....

Dept of Public works who is supposed to maintain these vacant properties,also has the complete list ...

My suggestion is that BLF get the list of properties, erfs, etc, from DPW and occupy them....

Magasulu have started the process in the Free State, he gave goverment properties to his daughter.

Hi guys.

Sorry about your bad experiences... You were just very unlucky with the girls you chose. Better luck next time
xxx

Hey,

So I might be new to the industry but I totally agree with La Femme. Maybe you need to start looking at other venues,

I personally do offer services towards all races, and would not be like a robot. If She specified on the phone that she does kiss etc, and its a different story at the venue then you do have the right to walk out.

But, NOT ALL of us white or indian ladies can be assumed to be the same as your one bad experience.

Come to The Doll house babes, let me accommodate your needs.

Xx

I just find it so amusing that people can't recognise their own racist tones whilst they are standing up against racism.
@kity, your homophobic comparison really put this in simple terms. I'll be sure to put it in my arsenal to use in future when dealing with similar rhetoric

On 2018-04-12 08:10:45 Kitty said:
However, until you have had to advertise your ass and mouth for rental use... you cannot claim to know the mindset and reasoning of an escort. If you had to that I think you would understand preference to racism.

Kitty, that's a poor reasoning. We all have preferences - one does not have to advertise their mouth and ass to know the distinction between racism and a preference.

Who a WG/MG sees is a personal choice. But the reason behind that choice is probably what some of the punters want laid out in the open each time threads like these make an appearance. An admission of guilt, if I can call it that. Haha! That will never happen because of the backlash that would ensue.

It's easy to generalise, especially when one is pushing their own agenda. It's just suits their narrative to generalise - punters and WGs are guilty of this.

We are all grown ups (hopefully) here - there are people who unfortunately hold racist views/beliefs and that dictates how they live their life. That's on them and I wish them all the best in life. But I would think that most people would want to distance themselves from such individuals, unless you're birds of the same feather.

And it's clear from this thread that lines are being blurred between inferiority complexes (some say it's self-hate) and racism.

My 2 cents

Look at a large escorts site like "adultwork" in the UK. You will see numerous wgs from various nationalities specifically state "no black guys". So is this racist or does it come down to experience with black men and how they treat wgs? I would think it comes down to bad experience and has absolutely nothing to do with racism.

Now as far as I know ESA does not allow wgs to state their color preference on their profile and thus the "ROAR" statement is used. There is good reason for that is we all know that in a country like SA this will be seen as racist and their would be calls for the site to be closed down.

On 2018-04-13 00:43:18 Pseudonyms said:
On 2018-04-12 08:10:45 Kitty said: However, until you have had to advertise your ass and mouth for rental use... you cannot claim to know the mindset and reasoning of an escort. If you had to that I think you would understand preference to racism.

Kitty, that's a poor reasoning. We all have preferences - one does not have to advertise their mouth and ass to know the distinction between racism and a preference.

Who a WG/MG sees is a personal choice. But the reason behind that choice is probably what some of the punters want laid out in the open each time threads like these make an appearance. An admission of guilt, if I can call it that. Haha! That will never happen because of the backlash that would ensue.

It's easy to generalise, especially when one is pushing their own agenda. It's just suits their narrative to generalise - punters and WGs are guilty of this.

We are all grown ups (hopefully) here - there are people who unfortunately hold racist views/beliefs and that dictates how they live their life. That's on them and I wish them all the best in life. But I would think that most people would want to distance themselves from such individuals, unless you're birds of the same feather.

And it's clear from this thread that lines are being blurred between inferiority complexes (some say it's self-hate) and racism.

I disagree that its poor reasoning... Perhaps poor understanding? You seem to have missed my point. From the comments, one punter in particular seems to think the only reason a girl wouldn't see a POC is racism. I've tried to explain preference. It seems that as a WG, you are not allowed to have preferences or preference is seen as racism. If this man had to do what we do... I believe he would soon understand the difference. Its easy to shout racism... than admit you can't always get what you want. No lady has to give a reason why she doesn't want to see someone. Just like a client doesn't have to put up with certain behaviours. My 'poor reasoning' is dont judge those in the industry unless you know the situation or circumstance'. Sorry if that point was unclear :)

Just for a laugh. Can you imagine a court case with a punter taking a WG to the constitutional court for a ROAR policy. Would be quite comical I believe.

'Judge, as a person of colour who lives in a free democracy... I believe I can throw money at a lady I desire and she should happily part her legs for me. It is my constitutional right to pay for sexual satisfaction!'

Sounds like it could be a good porno. Judge wearing a robe and nothing else. Sexy burly bailiffs. Fuzzy handcuffs...