On 2015-08-19 22:14:17 PeterBuck said:
ROAR LIVES AND IS ALIVE

Get with the program

People are worried that how ugly they look from the outside without realizing how ugly they are on the inside .

Uber, quote of the day goes to you.

Ubber indeed. we should all be taking care of both then x

I am black guy. I prefer South African black, indian or coloured girls. I only book foreign white girls when I am in Europe (prefer Mediterranean girls). I also keep away from Chinese and Indian(non South African) girls.

I am not racist, I am just excising my freedom of choice, so white girls you can also exercise your choice. Nothing racist about choice.

You are not selling a commodity but an intimate service.

@Teka the fact that you have to qualify yourself as a black guy first is indicative of the problem here. It easily becomes a black verses white thing. White guys that are against ROAR declare their white in order to give weight to their opinion and black guys that are "pro choice" do the same. The fact is most people including myself feel the need to declare their race when it comes to matter of race because well we are invisible here.

The bottom line here is that regardless of what our various opinions are and Valentina has stated several times (funny that I use her to add weight to this *my bad*), you are selling a service. Once you do that you no longer have the luxury of choice.

@Teka as the consumer of the service you sir can choose whoever you want. Your choice will never be considered as discriminatory.

"But the women that are in this business and that render these services are just people too and therefore should be afforded the same right to choice"...you may say.

Well technically these women who provide us this much needed service have themselves decided to commoditize themselves by offering these services. Cold hard fact like it or not, regardless of how intimate it is. Once you cross a line you cross a line and you have to deal with it. You sell I buy simple. If you do not want to sell to me then you are discriminating (simple). You cannot use skin color to deny this service; however, you can use other reasons that would be possible with all shades (hygiene, state of mind, even dress code etc). With this everyone is on the same playing field and it's about how you present yourself and your money.

This business is not regulated therefore yes WGs can do as they please. They can see green guys only if they want no one can take them to court for that. If it ever gets formalized they will have a problem though. In fact it will work in their (WGs that see only certain races) if this industry is never regulated. Dare I say, it may be the very reason ESA does not allow blatantly stating that a WG sees specific races only.


Some say build a bridge and get over it. Well it actually is a big ass bridge I need to build. While I'm busy building it you probably going to get my rants in the mean time.

In the meantime to those who enjoy the "privileges" of their skin color please do so happily without getting all pissed off when someone not enjoying that same privilege complains. That goes for everyone black, white, mixed and whatever.

On 2015-08-27 13:07:14 NotSoShyKev said:
you are selling a service. Once you do that you no longer have the luxury of choice.

Never have I heard the argument for indentured slavery put so eloquently ! Well said sir. I wish someone could remind the Indians of that when they comment about racism, since they did sell their services after all.

In fact anyone who sells their labour ! No freedom of choice for anyone !!!

Right ? What do you reckon NotSoShyKev ?

PS, That was sarcasm... your statement was absolute bollocks Kev, you can't really think like this can you ?

Notsoshykev, him being black and all, yes he thinks like that. Pity!

Maybe he can use all those laborers who obviously sold their rights away to build that bridge for him to get over...

Kev, that's flawed logic. Service providers always have a choice - put yourself in their shoes for a change and really think about what you wrote in that last post.

Clearly context is not a concept that some of you are aware of. Yes context - choice in this case refers to and only to choosing between providing a service to a black person or a white person only. In fact this is so. Service providers are prohibited by law from discrimination of any kind. Now as I said you can choose to use some creative ways of choosing not to provide such a service to a black person but it can never be based on the colour of their skin. @deamonza - in future please try reading and understanding all that is said not just one sentence...maybe then you will understand the context of the statement.

Building a bridge is not necessary actually. There is nothing to get over. I will never get over blatant discrimination nor will I not say something about it whenever someone tries to justify it especially in the guise of a right to choice.