On 2025-02-17 15:49:13 sircumsized said:
Lol tele are u stalking me lololol so funny. You have no idea my depth how deep or shallow but your woke bullshit funny

Nope just see your name next to that thread *A LOT*. Almost as much as RB. And nothing else you contribute to the forum has much value, so yeah I've got a pretty good gauge of your "depth" (or lack thereof).


BTW can you even define what it means to be woke, or is it just another one of these:

www.instagram.com/reprabb/p/CvSVyu8sUlS/

On 2025-02-17 15:59:48 Teletubby said:
On 2025-02-17 15:49:13 sircumsized said: Lol tele are u stalking me lololol so funny. You have no idea my depth how deep or shallow but your woke bullshit funny

Nope just see your name next to that thread *A LOT*. Almost as much as RB. And nothing else you contribute to the forum has much value, so yeah I've got a pretty good gauge of your "depth" (or lack thereof).


BTW can you even define what it means to be woke, or is it just another one of these:

www.instagram.com/reprabb/p/CvSVyu8sUlS/

Hey Teletubby....what is it with u and everybody else making me part of your discussions snd then expect me not to tell you where to get off?

Did I address you?

Mention you?

Are you addressing me?

If so...what you tryna say?

RB.

"what is it with u snd everybody else making me part of your discussions snd then expect me not to tell you where to get off?"

- Why would you tell me where to get off? All I did was say you comment on the word association threads frequently. Is that news to you? and more importantly why on earth would you be offended at that observation?

"Did I address you?

Mention you?"

- No, but fortunately that's not how conversation works. I'm free to mention you without waiting for you to address me. This isn't a second grade classroom, and you're not the teacher.

"Are you addressing me?

If so...what you tryna say?"

-No, I'm not addressing you. All I did is make the (entirely non-judgmental) observation that you are a frequent commenter on those particular threads. For someone who often comments on the "comprehension" of others, yours seems to have gone missing

What we really need is a dedicated, pinned topic called "THE MUDPIT" or "THE ARENA"

On 2025-02-17 16:29:39 Teletubby said:

"what is it with u snd everybody else making me part of your discussions snd then expect me not to tell you where to get off?"

- Why would you tell me where to get off? All I did was say you comment on the word association threads frequently. Is that news to you? and more importantly why on earth would you be offended at that observation?

"Did I address you?

Mention you?"

- No, but fortunately that's not how conversation works. I'm free to mention you without waiting for you to address me. This isn't a second grade classroom, and you're not the teacher.

"Are you addressing me?

If so...what you tryna say?"

-No, I'm not addressing you. All I did is make the (entirely non-judgmental) observation that you are a frequent commenter on those particular threads. For someone who often comments on the "comprehension" of others, yours seems to have gone missing

I make no claims about anything Teletubby, unlike you making them for me as do others too.

:)

And knowing teletubby's engagement on forum..let's not play games . No need to undermine each others intelligence ...it is soooo distasteful and wreaks of shitty ex-democrat dishonesty.

RB.

On 2025-02-17 15:01:30 Teletubby said:

She clearly knows more than you do.

Cite your sources tubby.

"I make no claims about anything Teletubby, unlike you making them for me as do others too."

- What are you talking about? What claims have I made for you?


"And knowing teletubby's engagement on forum..let's not play games . No need to undermine each others intelligence ...it is soooo distasteful and wreaks of shitty ex-democrat dishonesty."

- "Soooo distasteful" when someone does it to you, perfectly fine when you do it to others? how many times have you questioned others comprehension in recent weeks? Yet you've clearly failed to understand my (fairly elementary) post. But pointing that out is "undermining your intelligence"? All I said was you post on those threads a lot, and you are so desperate to take offense... it reeks of the rightwings perpetual victimhood.

On 2025-02-17 16:59:08 Minime V10.1 said:
On 2025-02-17 15:01:30 Teletubby said:
She clearly knows more than you do.


Cite your sources tubby.

What are you asking for? For sources of Vance's douchebaggery? or for the bit you quoted?

On 2025-02-17 17:25:38 Teletubby said:

"I make no claims about anything Teletubby, unlike you making them for me as do others too."

- What are you talking about? What claims have I made for you?


"And knowing teletubby's engagement on forum..let's not play games . No need to undermine each others intelligence ...it is soooo distasteful and wreaks of shitty ex-democrat dishonesty."

- "Soooo distasteful" when someone does it to you, perfectly fine when you do it to others? how many times have you questioned others comprehension in recent weeks? Yet you've clearly failed to understand my (fairly elementary) post. But pointing that out is "undermining your intelligence"? All I said was you post on those threads a lot, and you are so desperate to take offense... it reeks of the rightwings perpetual victimhood.

Like the democrats taking things out of context to suit an argument random and give it credibility.

I call bullshit...plain and simple.


Now breath teletubs...BREATH.

GRIN.

RB.

So "out of context" is all any of you have? That tracks-it's about the best one can hope for when the right wings hypocrisy is exposed. (BTW just labelling something bullshit isn't an argument)

I should breath? You're the one that went all hyper-defensive at the mere mention of your name, whether critical or not.