Yeah, got to agree with Mujahid ........

Then this is the thing I don't get ..... if it's fullhouse you want why do you want to be booking massage girls?

Nikita, after all this time in the industry it would appear you still understand how a man's brain works. We want what we want and we want what we can't have even more.

I'd like to try 8t one day. offers welcome

Posduif. 😆 I have asked this question to many clients that has pushed for full house.... the answer... "we want clean girls"

Yes. I do indeed understand how it works. It is unfortunate that the "clean" girl then crosses the line and her perceived value immediately plummets and she then starts loosing clients and money that she would have made in the exclusive massage industry while she then needs to compete in the much harsher full house market.

On 2016-03-24 11:40:11 Nikita Spa Management said:
Posduif. 😆 I have asked this question to many clients that has pushed for full house.... the answer... "we want clean girls"

With respect, it seems some of your clients are a lot dumber than what you think they are if thats their answer. I mean what about gals who were notorious wg's for years then one day decides massage only from then on?


[QUOTE;506934;Nikita Spa Management]
It is unfortunate that the "clean" girl then crosses the line and her perceived value immediately plummets and she then starts loosing clients and money that she would have made in the exclusive massage industry while she then needs to compete in the much harsher full house market. [/QUOTE]

That is a rediculous assertion. I mean will the massage only girl who sucked & fucked some tollie then broadcast that fact for her "value" to drop? From some of the past forum threads Id say her value will go thru the roof because most of the time massage girls are hot.

Oh and one more thing, FH girls are in my book not valued less than massage girls. I know many a WG who are priceless to me.

I am not arguing the fact that there are full house clients that wants to have mg's ... i am however arguing that there are clients that want massage only and dont want do deal with being bothered with girls offering more and there are girls that do not want to offer more and dont want to be bothered with such requests.... this forms a great demand and supply dinamic. In fact what i am saying is that there is a place for everyone and every need. Should we not respect personal choice? Both ways?

Ps: girls loosing value... implies that if she was working or advertising fullhouse she would have to compete with 200 more girls than in massage but for more money per session. If she remains in massage she works for less money per session and the massage clients that was hunting until they conquered her wont pay the initial extra again ... they move on to go conquer the next impossible mission so she will loose that regular income too. I have seen this happen over and over again. A very busy massage girl can loose up to half her income after the initial shift. Eventually they get quite and ends up joining the fullhouse girls not out of choice but out of need.

@Nikita: Very interesting perspective!

True story