On 2017-09-18 11:39:20 DIRECTORSSS said:
Cannot find the thread in wich Veronica said Sharon stole R60000 from her client either. Can anybody post the link or paragraph here please?

This one came on the scene quicker than i expected

On 2017-09-18 11:34:42 Vegas said:
@ESA, ladies accuse each other of all sorts of nonsense on and off the forum all the time. Why does ESA get personally involved in these spats, what does it have to do with advertising on ESA or what punters want? Why ban people for unrelated personal nonsense. Let them be. These kind of things will never stop and there is no role for ESA to play in getting involved in these spats. We're here to look at profiles and book ladies for our pleasure. If ladies get banned because of unrelated nonsense it benefits no one. Yes ban them or any punter that contravenes the forum and site rules, but other than telling them to take their accusations and cat fights off line I cant see why ESA should get involved honestly.

Very good point. Who's interests are they looking out for here. Definitely not the wg and not punters

On 2017-09-18 11:54:40 Kingsman said:


This one came on the scene quicker than i expected

What was your expectation?

Dear Matt,

"Shakira is a pathological liar she has always been and will always be a pathological liar."

That assertion, apart from the (in my view) libel ramifications, is just plain low and, frankly, paints you in a pathetic light.

Please note Rule #1 of the ESA Forum: Respect

Maybe ESA should practice what it preaches. And from a psychological viewpoint, your preemptive warning that I should not call for Shakira's reinstatement seems more of an admission on your part that the banning was wrong in the first place.

From my reading, Sharon mentioned the R60K in the below "comic relief" thread, presumably as a result from info Shakira gave her. Maybe Shakira can tell gary to tell us why she mentioned R60K to Sharon:

www.esa.co.za/forum/thread.php



Then:

www.esa.co.za/forum/thread.php


On page 7:

[QUOTE;792944;Veronica Franco] I have just had contact with Sharon. She was apologetic and admits her wrong in what happened with my client. She's not denying it with the exception of a few things Shakira said my client said. But she has given a far more detailed account of what happened and I am going to the said restaurant to speak to staff. That says volumes more to me about who's telling the truth so far....but let's see.[/QUOTE]


Veronica as far as I can tell never herself mentioned a R60K. Besides, why did Sharon admit her wrongdoing to Veronica?

@reenaP...what Im getting at as well. Veronica must provide proof of something somebody else said?

@reenaP Since you had time to read through all the threads, why don't you call Shakira yourself? I'm sure you can figure out how to get her phone number...

@DIRECTORSSS To paraphrase Joy,

"ESA has their own reasons to have taken the steps they did against Veronica according to the information they have been given other than some email from someone that is less than honest.

I'm sure ESA gets this all the time and knows when to keep information to themselves. Let them sort it out between them, because this doesn't concern any punter, especially if threats were made and this mater goes further.

Esa answers to nobody as they protect their own interests as a business. We all do."

The shoe is on the other foot now, isn't it? Still support Joy's position?

Ja Gary. I so support Joy's position on this.

Okay, so let Veronica and ESA sort it out between them.

They will gary....Im sure