SG, I've always liked your posts, and maybe I'm reading these wrong, but it appears to be 'a bit off'

"Immoral job" ... really. Based on whose moral judgement.

"touching the very deep essence of your soul" ... true
But why if it's a sex worker, it's immoral. But when it's revered when it's a pastor preaching a sermon or the band in church when they hit those heavenly notes. Is church not just one massive orgy with strangers. Why should sex work be respected any less ????

At the end of the day it's work. It has the same value as any other work. Every worker has a right to be respected. A cleaner isn't any less of a person than the CEO, and their work is not to be devalued but appreciated.

Yes everyone is entitled to their moral beliefs ... but keep it to yourself. You not entitled to belittle someone else because of those beliefs. That borders on abuse, and you would then be a hypocrite, as abuse too is immoral to most.

On 2025-02-26 23:09:56 J_J said:
SG, I've always liked your posts, and maybe I'm reading these wrong, but it appears to be 'a bit off'

"Immoral job" ... really. Based on whose moral judgement.

"touching the very deep essence of your soul" ... true
But why if it's a sex worker, it's immoral. But when it's revered when it's a pastor preaching a sermon or the band in church when they hit those heavenly notes. Is church not just one massive orgy with strangers. Why should sex work be respected any less ????

At the end of the day it's work. It has the same value as any other work. Every worker has a right to be respected. A cleaner isn't any less of a person than the CEO, and their work is not to be devalued but appreciated.

Yes everyone is entitled to their moral beliefs ... but keep it to yourself. You not entitled to belittle someone else because of those beliefs. That borders on abuse, and you would then be a hypocrite, as abuse too is immoral to most.

Love this post it's spot on not everyone has the same morals or belief system and even our personal boundries differ.

At my age a taffybaby and taffydaddy would be a better term.....its stil sweet but takes a lot more effort...hehehe

But that realy aint a answer to the OPs question..

My honest opinion about sugardaddys and working girls... most young ladies aint here for that..if they wanted that they would be on something like a dating site deigned specifically for that type of "dating" and not esa.

Sugardaddy's and being a sugarbaby aint security it aint a future and it definitly aint love.

The ladies here are here to build their own security to build their own futures and maybe one day find their one love. Or maybe they had found all that already and are here to maintain that.

The reality is a sb/sd arangements are temporary arrangements at best and almost never lead to a secure future for the lady.
There is very few sugardaddy's out there that can afford or want to set up the lady in someway that she can be financially secure and independent after their sugaring is done.

Yes they might take her out to dinners, even buy expensive gift and some might even buy cars . But very few can or want to invest in her future.

Being a escort might to men seem like the worse choice when a lady make a choice between being a escort and maybe being someones sugarbaby...but in reality it is the safer, less emotional and better financial choice in the end... she gets to have multiple "sugardaddys" that all pay a set amount when seeing her and she gets to write her own pay check and do her own thing. She is free to do what she want and when she wants..being a sugarbaby comes with restrictions on her whole life to please one man. Its like marriage but without the security of a future together offered by marriage.

Thank you for finding the words I couldn't @Miss Red.

J J

Keep it to myself, who made you the administrator or policeman of this site.

Your comparisons and bashing of the church is pathetic indeed. Morals don't have to be taught at church , keep your pity comment . You are entitled to it but keep it to yourself, unless I addressed you. Miss Red actually clarified and put it into context , what you and I obviously missed out on.

It's a dangerous game to play... rather not.

Made my day. hahaha

On 2025-02-25 14:39:01 Sargent Green said:
An Antelope has more chance of being adopted by a Lion family, than a WG turning down a sugar daddy with a wad of a wallet. They work for money, most don't choose their clients, as long as he can produce the money, the more the merrier.

@Ashleigh, Miss Red and J_J, so well said and thank you.

I'm here because I have people who depend on me, and I too love my independence.
I also don't consider sex something mystical or immoral. It is a pretty fundamental human need and behaviour. All that matters is that the people you do it with are informed, consenting adults.

xxx

Jade

As a girl in corporate and a WG, i wouldnt mind a sugar daddy... Though i love my independence, a little spoiling from sugar daddy won't hurt... Makes life a bit easier....

Well said Ashleigh and Miss Red. A punter and WG are both delusional if:

1. Punter thinks he has found a SB while he still punts and she sees other clients. Wake up, fool! You're no SD, you're just a paying client who has to fork out a bit more.

2. WG thinks a punter is her sugardaddy while she sees other clients. Wake up, you're delulu! He is a punter and you're a SP. He is a regular client at best, not a SD.