The problem with having a argument with a idiot, is you got to come down to his level and then he / she beats you with experience.
In any case, I do not think Thilo will understand all those big words.

I can't see how this guy can be banned. He has placed comments on some of these girl's profile saying he has seen them and saying the reason he was not happy was their looks. I guess some people have different tastes. When some people punt, looks are the most important thing to them. And what is pretty to one might not be to another. Others prefer the entire experience or experience/skill of the girl. Personally, looks aren't the most important thing to me....but hey, different strokes for different folks. Unless we have started banning people for being crude in their comments, or saying things we rather not hear or want to believe, how can he be banned? If he has manipulated account and posted under multiple logins, then something is not right and by all means, he should be banned, but otherwise....

At the end of the day this is a public forum. There will be all kinds of people with all kinds of different opinions. Or are we becoming like the government trying to censor what we don't like?

@ Wolverine

Have you noticed that in none of Thilo's defenses did he say 'look, I visited these girls - didn't like them - and they got 1 star!'

He hasn't because he never visited them. What he has said is that 'he didn't like how they look' and 'he followed what other people's opinions were'.

If I got shit for my 1 star vote of Minnox I would tell ESA and everyone else to get fucked. It's my opinion, I visited her, and that is that. End of story.

Thilo CAN'T say this because he hasn't visited them.

It's really that simple.

@ jsnake

I did notice that in the comments section of at least two of the girls mentioned, his comments (though crude)suggest that he visited them.

Maybe the solution here is for ESA to have a differnet rating system.

Just as a suggestion, something like this:

rate from 1 - 5 the following:

1. Looks
2. Cleanliness
3. Venue
4. Service

The overall rating should then be an average of the above?

Else remove the rating system completely. Over the last couple of months I've seen punters accusing other forum members of being competing WG's, loyal punters worked into a frenzy because someone has given a low rating to one of their favorite WG's and so many fights started regarding the rating system. It is honestly making the forum an unpleasant place.

At the end of the day I just disregard the ratings and rely only on the comments section and/or a solid review. I'm not realy sure what value the ratings section is adding.

For the most part - I agree. Something needs to be done about the ratings system. I have been thinking about it a lot and have a few ideas - though nothing that will serve as a panacea.

I have also noticed that on some of Thilo's comments there seems to be an indication that he has in fact visited that specific lady. This is why I used the word ''majority'' in my earlier post.

In the coming days, I intend to start a thread addressing the issues with the current rating system...

@ jsnake

I read Thilo's comments on Sensual Simone profile.

And I came to the conclusion that he did visit her in person.

thilo
2011-01-03 05:31:27 Very dissapointing.I guess I was expecting too much. Much more plumpier in real life.I also guess that the pictures were responsible for putting her in the top 10.Won't go back

thilo
2011-01-21 12:44:49 I nighed her and have to admit the photographer has done very well in the makeover dept.I am sad parting with my money in this instance

Like [WOLVERINE] say crude, but that is the idea we get.

So if he in fact visit ed her, I can't see a problem with his 1 star vote.

I think it will only be fair if the ladies in question can clear this up for us.

@ Sirfucalot

Simone HAS cleared this up already. I refer you to the following thread:

www.esa.co.za/forum/thread.php

Simone has since edited his thread because she was unhappy with the further controversy it was creating. However, the thread stated that she couldn't understand why Thilo was bad mouthing her as he had never been with her. She went so far as to offer him a free booking so that can actually experience her and then come back with an honest review. She went on to state that if he still feels that the 1 star rating is justified then it would be fine - at least then it would be based on an actual experience.

I am not making this up and anyone else that has read the thread and remembers it can confirm.

In fact, several posts down in the thread there is a comment by Simone where she confirms that she has never been with him. Please read it for yourself.

The fact that Thilo went so far as to imply (on his comments on her profile) that he has actually been with her is an even further disgrace.

Nevertheless, perhaps more telling than anything else, is the fact that Thilo has yet to claim he visited these girls in his defense.

@ jsnake

Thank you for clearing this up.

It was just the way I read his comments on her profile, that I got the idea that he indeed visited her twice.

@ SIRfucalot
Just to add to what @jsnake says, Thilo could not have visited Simone, she claims to be 'non-multiracial'. The same with Jade. This guy does not meet their criteria. What did Aesop say? 'ONE hot summer’s day a Fox was strolling through an orchard till he came to a bunch of Grapes ... “I am sure they are sour.”(Work it out for yourself ...) The other ratings and comments are clearly based on what he sees in the pictures on the web.

This topic is going on and on without any resolution.The bottom line is that Thilo has been dishonest and why the deafening silence from Thilo.
A suggestion, leave 'Looks' out of the rating system,the proof of the pudding is tasting/eating it, or the Chinese proverb,when you stoke the fire you dont look at the clock on the mantle piece.