Wow, I can honestly say that I am surprised with the responses. To put the record straight, I’m not the PP to which you are referring. The question was an honest question. I mean, if you were able to separate your emotions from the question and think about it. Can any working lady really honestly say they had an encounter with a punter which if they could have rated him, he would score a 100% - a total perfection score? There was not even the slightest possibility that he could have done something better.

Whether you a punter, rating a working lady or a working lady rating a punter, what is the purpose of the rating system, if you are not allowed to give any rating below 5/5 in fear of victimisation and I say this with all due respect.

CBS – I concur. If there is a rating system in place, then surely you should be able to rate based on the service as per the agreement made prior to the service delivered. You should not be criticised or victimised for making an honest rating.

Yes, I understand that we are referring to an environment where people might provide negative ratings which the lady doesn’t deserve and this should be somehow controlled. We are after all referring to a system which might have a huge impact on the ladies. Maybe justification of a negative rating will assist somehow, but in the same manner a positive rating should also be justified.

Ps on the above mentioned issue and this forum – I take my hat off to ESA. Whether you have it right (or not) all the times, to manage a site such as this must be a huge challenge….

I think @Peter_P makes a good point... that's why I've only submitted 1 review to date since I joined, I've only recently seen the usefulness of it.

As we are all here to find a moment oc companionship and to enjoy ourselves we should be a little harsher with them, after all, we pay for their services, we should expect more if something can be improved on!

And yes, because of some of the ratings I have opted not to call some of the ladies, I hope they read the reviews, if it's total crap, they should comment on the reviews too, they could also make improvements and ask the punters to give them another chance to redeem themselves etc.

I agree with the view that good ratings are given too liberally, which distorts the essence of what the ratings is trying to achieve, of seperating the cream from the sour cream. Some punters also confuse looks with service and attitude ... It is quite feasible for a not so good looking girl to have great rating and equally the other way round.

In my opinion, the rating should be as follows:
1 = delivers everything under par - huge disappointment
2 = Delivers some aspects less than she advertises.
3 = Delivers what she advertises. Average service = average rating
4 = Delivers average service but does some things better than expected
5 = Delivers everything above average = want to keep her for yourself.

Hi everybody,

I do not think that Peter_P's idea is very realistic. If you compare any wg's venue with the White House, we would all get zero. Similarly if you compare any wg's venue with the penthouse at the Burj Al Arab, then we will all get zero.

So more realistic would be to compare apples with apples. In other words, compare the security at my place with the security of another wg, and not the White house.

I don't see what is wrong with a punter who felt that his car was safe, giving a 5.

And I definitely don't have a problem with a rating lower than 5, but then I surely have the right to question that rating?
GBS said that he is not happy about a dirty dustbin. I totally agree, but that is exactly my point. Don't just vote a 2 or 3 or whatever, say that the dustbin was dirty. That way the girl can learn something, and the next punter can understand what the problem was.

The new system is a good step in the right direction. It is now much easier to spot a troll: If most of the girl's votes were good and from known punters, and you suddenly get a new
name voting her down, then you can almost be assured that it is a troll or another girl's pimp/boyfriend/alias.

But I still don't see why a client cannot vote a 5 if he was more than happy with the service/looks/safety etc. That does not mean that he thinks my security is better than the White House, or that he thinks everything is 100% with no room for improvement. It simply means he felt that his time and money was 100% well spent.

Hardcoldtruth: Your summary is much more realistic.

Just my opinion.
NM

Maybe ESA should append a set of similar questions to a review so that the WG can respond to and rate the punter.

Now Ben I find that a totally interesting proposition...

Youtube realised that a 1-5 rating system doesn't really work in real life. You hardly ever get people that will actually rate anything except 1 and 5.

Hence the thumbs-up, thumbs-down system was adopted. And you can judge anything by simply comparing the amount of thumb-ups with the thumb-downs.

the system is just there to point us in the right direction hopefully,if a chick get a bad rating,in most caes 2 or more then she probably deserved it vice versa