In as much as this WG appears to offer shit service,I don't think her pic should be circulated. As I've said before,no gun was held against the vindictive punter to visit the wg AGAIN. He's equally culpable for the shit service he received. ESA should intervene in whatever way they deem fit.

Its not cool at all hey..so people are pure spitefull

Respect is the key.When a Punter is not happy with the service just walk away.Linking out anyone's information or pics in both parties is immature as it can affected person's life negatively.

If a Punter's privacy is important let it be to the wg's aswell.

Welcome Back Blue!!!

It seems to be the only useful lesson from this is don't show face shots if you don't want people circulating them. Don't tell people where you are from if you don't want them knowing.

Personally I would not want people circulating pics of my hairy a-hole so I only let a select few people taking those shots.

Obviously Naledi is right that spreading personal information on an anonymous forum defeats the point of anonymity. Should ESA get involved? Not sure, where is the boundary? Reporting that someone is kak in bed is about as personal as it gets and that type of reporting is encouraged. Showing a face seems like a pretty relevant contribution on this forum, it is merely an extension of the rest of the body, which we display on the website.

Perhaps the lady in question should try to resolve the problem herself? Maybe if she did not offend punters then they would treat her better?

Thanks Sugar xxx

Threatening that the community will see those pics, means her family will see them too!

Only a heartless person will do that no matter what her crime is! It's not like the girl threatened his family or his job!

It's so so wrong!

Blue's Back!
Befok!
But why so far?
Now I have to save for diesel too ;-)

So, Naledi, if a girl has quite recognizable hips you disagree with guys referring to her older names/profiles?
Fine with me.
But eh, how about the less obvious figures, read 'majority'?
I stand by what I said, smoke the bad one's out!
Nothing wrong with paying schoolfees once, but on end is unfair!

On 2015-11-10 19:57:38 Naledi said:
This is not a warning to punters, its just revenge.

Naledi - this is spot on. Its not about offering a review or 'smoking' anyone out, its about power. And that is abusive and wrong, however appalling the service may or may not have been.

@ Rock wilder,
I second, oops, third, your statement (someone beat me to it*wink).

Anyway, the bottom line is actually not even about whether someone shows her face, or not.

We are clearly seeing a blatant blackmail situation unfolding!!!

Let's elucidate...
A point which would have been picked up, if you read the thread (Naledi posted) is that he had 'funky times' TWO YEARS AGO.
So... uhmmm I wonder...tut...tut...tut