On 2018-04-29 19:33:12 RoboCock said:
Yip I agree its derogatory to women... But this is not a business that in general one would consider as non-objectifying to women. We come here to find what we want, and when what we want does not tally with what was advertised there's reason to cry foul.
@ GreyKnight ... Yours was one of the reviews I thought I could trust. Now I know not to. I can get a proper massage for a lot less than what I paid for sensual.

I fully trust GreyKnight's ratings. He has always been spot on and an absalut gentleman.

I have to agree, beauty is in the eye of the "beerholder". For some more beer is required than for others to make me attaractive. Each and every one of us, use a different set of criteria to base our ratings on.

For me it is not the looks that make a session great, but rather the chemistry between myself and the SP. I would rather spend time with a lady that has a +5 personality than a +5 in looks department.

If that's really true, good for u guys, but you're screwing up the rating system for those of us who place equal if not more emphasis on attraction.
There are sections in the review for looked like pics, personality rating, telephone manner, please do not mix these with looks... You can give a 0 for looks and a 5 for everything else and write an amazing review on personality, massage technique, conversation, etc... That way those who dont care about attraction would still be interested, those who do would bypass the profile...
Its not like the venues here have different pricing structures for a Lambo and a Beetle, they're the same... If u describe a Beetle as a Lambo I would be pissed again.

You know you're talking about a living breathing person right? How would you like somebody to describe your mother or daughter? Would you like that person to use tact? If so why not also with the sp's

It was an analogy!!! We make a purchase based on what's described. It was an abstraction to get a point across nothing more.
Would u not be incensed if u paid for a lambo, didn't mind paying for a lambo but got a station wagon instead... Again analogy, abstraction... If u paid for a station wagon and got a station wagon, great no issues... You got exactly what u expected to get.
Not everyone in this business should be in this business... Just like not everyone who wants to be president should be president... But that one u get right, nothing politically incorrect about that right?

On 2018-04-30 09:11:26 RoboCock said:
You can give a 0 for looks and a 5 for everything else and write an amazing review on personality, massage technique, conversation, etc... That way those who dont care about attraction would still be interested, those who do would bypass the profile...

Now you are just making me laugh! I think I know which girl you are referring to when you said my review was not to be trusted. Pray tell me what was the rating I gave her for her face? LMFAO! You sir are a hypocrite. Looking at some of your reviews I don't agree with the 5/5 you give for body rating (you know full well what her body looks like now after the damage she's done to it, yet you still give a 5?). Please do not look at my reviews in future.

It is also clear that you only want to visit supermodel look-likes. Once again I ask you to not follow my reviews as I do not always book the porcelain dolls on this site. I have found that lesser attractive ladies in a lot of cases provide better service than the stunners on this site. So now they are NOT allowed a +5 rating for great service, just because their faces aren't pretty enough? Bullshit!

It is about the service for me as jjsoap said. I write a review on my own personal experiences and preferences.

PUNTERS PLEASE BE WARNED!!!
GreyKnight does not put a lot of emphasis on a lady's face when visiting or writing a review! If you visit a lady he wrote a review on, note that he wrote it mainly on the service received. This GK character has a wide spectrum of taste in terms of looks, age etc. A pretty face DOES NOT make or break a booking for him. You have been warned!

Thank you.

Seems like some people are mostly after the 'looks' ..... that's called being shallow.......

Reminds me of a movie... 'Shallow Hal'......

And another thing..... for 'analogy' purposes, the ladies aren't 'products', or cars or whatever..... They are ladies, and should be treated and referenced to as Ladies.....

I did say I don't trust your reviews, and I stand by what I said, I will bypass every 1... As far as the girl u mentioned destroying herself... the parts I like are still pristine, she's still in great shape, and every session I've had with her was out of this world...
Hypocrisy? She's still a 5 to me ... No denying i am as shallow as they come... if she were less than a 5 I would say so without fear, and stop seeing her... My shallowness is definitive evidence of my capability to judge objectively lookswise and otherwise, I'm not afraid to say so, I won't spare feelings... If said Lady is reading this post, I hope she knows who u are and that u don't actually see her as a 5 you say she is but are being the gentleman that u are and not actually rating her looks... If she were missing an arm or leg, I would still put her at 5, even in that state she would still be head and shoulders above the girl I saw...

If I were looking for personality, conversation, an overall nice girl to spend time with .... This is not the place I'd come to for that... This is a market, pay to get what u want...