It's not a bad thing, both sides benefit, as long as both play by the same rules. It starts getting tricky when one party decide to "bend" the rules, then things get nasty. I have noticed that a WG gets raving reviews from credible punters, then all of a sudden there's a bad review, and another one, by seemingly credible punters. This must indicate that the ROE have somewhat changed, and I've seen it, once the bad reviews start coming in, business starts declining, punters start seeking greener pastures, new deals are being struck, and alas, the WG disappears from the scene. Ja neh, socio economics if fun.