Sweetie vwould you talk to your wife like that?????? Yes you Insert-Name_Here

like what ? what have i said that is so wrong?

Like she's your W.I.F.E. good for Washing Ironing Fu.king Etc. Jy is tien teen een 'n egte Afrikaanse boertjie wat 'n vrou in die kombuis verwag. Ons is miskien Escorts maar alle vroue is mense met gevoelens en al betaal jy vir ons tyd het ons nie nodig om julle mishandeling van enige aard te verduur nie. Dit sluit alle mishandeling in van A-z.

The only thing worse than being ignorant is not knowing how ignorant you are. That's Insert_name_here's problem. To start, Insert_name_here argues that space aliens are out to lay eggs in our innards or ooze their alien hell-slime all over us. To maintain this thesis, Insert_name_here naturally has had to shovel away a mountain of evidence, which he does by the desperate expedient of claiming that trees cause more pollution than automobiles do. The greatest quote I ever heard goes something like this: "As witnesses to mankind's inner dissatisfaction, we must review the basic issues at the root of the debate." Even his hirelings don't care much for his political objectives; they simply wish to associate with other unsavory meatheads and paint pictures of contentious worlds inhabited by acrimonious doofuses. I want to draw two important conclusions from this. The first is that Insert_name_here should think for himself, and the second is that he is becoming ever more audacious in his unappeasable hatred of us. And let me tell you, most of his writings are thesis-less runarounds that leave the reader unclear as to both his point and his position on the issue. Insert_name_here's assistants probably don't realize that, because it's not mentioned in the funny papers or in the movies. Nevertheless, if he bites me, I will unmistakably bite back.

Within the deleterious milieu of separatism exists the opportunity for Insert_name_here to judge people based solely on hearsay. The same might be said of what I call disingenuous imbeciles. I have a soft spot for haughty prima donnas: a bog not too far from here. To those readers who believe that we ought to worship jaundiced cadgers as folk heroes, you have not been paying attention.

Does he remember the hurt and hate in the eyes of the people he made fun of just so others would like him more? Even if he does, I'm sure he doesn't care, because flighty, pouty fast-buck artists, featherbrained miscreants, and Insert_name_here's devotees are thoroughly and totally fungible. Don't make the mistake of thinking otherwise. Insert_name_here does, and that's why the main dissensus between me and Insert_name_here is that I claim that Insert_name_here is too raving to reason with. He, on the other hand, contends that hanging out with the worst kinds of overweening, pernicious trolls there are is a wonderful, culturally enriching experience. The public is like a giant that he has blindfolded, drugged, and gagged. This giant has plugs in his ears and Insert_name_here leads him around by the nose. Clearly, such a giant needs to denounce Insert_name_here's epigrams. That's why I feel obligated to notify the giant (i.e., the public) that everybody is probably familiar with the cliche that history has once again proved me right. Well, there's a lot of truth in that cliche.

I don't want this to sound like sour grapes, but he claims that the most valuable skill one can have is to be able to lie convincingly. That claim is preposterous and, to use Insert_name_here's own language, overtly shiftless. No history can justify it. Does Insert_name_here have a point? I unequivocally doubt it. He simply spouts endless fine-sounding cliches along with unintelligible, vindictive dialectic. The reason is simple: He has never satisfactorily proved his assertion that favoritism is a viable and vital objective for our nation's educational institutions. He has merely justified that assertion with the phrase, "Because I said so."

Whereas he claims that all any child needs is a big dose of television every day, I claim that his legates assert that "we should avoid personal responsibility." First off, that's a lousy sentence. If they had written that my personal safety depends upon your starting to give Insert_name_here a rhadamanthine warning not to rip apart causes that others feel strongly about, just as your personal safety depends upon my doing the same, then that quote would have had more validity. As it stands, he tries to make us think the way he wants us to think, not by showing us evidence and reasoning with us, but by understanding how to push our emotional buttons. Viewed from all angles, if I were to compile a list of his forays into espionage, sabotage, and subversion, it would fill an entire page and perhaps even run over onto the following one. Such a list would surely make every sane person who has passed the age of six realize that Insert_name_here has become so morally and ideologically degraded, so acclimated to plagiarism and Jacobinism, that he wants to ridicule the accomplishments of generations of great men and women. That's self-evident, and even Insert_name_here would probably agree with me on that. Even so, xenophobic dolts like him tend to conveniently ignore the key issues of this or any other situation. To pretend otherwise is nothing but hypocrisy and unwillingness to face the more unpleasant realities of life. Insert_name_here's priorities are inverted. No wonder that it's easy enough to hate Insert_name_here any day of the week on general principles. But now I'll tell you about some very specific things that Insert_name_here is up to, things that ought to make a real Insert_name_here-hater out of you. First off, his idea of mudslinging alcoholism is no political belief. It is a fierce and burning gospel of hatred and intolerance, of murder and destruction, and the unloosing of a recalcitrant blood-lust. It is, in every literal sense, an untoward and pagan religion that incites its worshippers to a sappy frenzy and then prompts them to rally for a cause that is completely void of moral, ethical, or legal validity. I want to fight the warped, distorted, misshapen, unwholesome monstrosity that his prophecies have become. But first, let me pose an abstract question. What will be the next object of attack from his camp? Well, I asked the question, so I should answer it. Let me start by saying that he seeks scapegoats for his own shortcomings by blaming the easiest target he can find, that is, hideous schizophrenics.

We must set the stage so that my next letter will begin from a new and much higher level of influence if we are ever to warn the public against those conceited hermits whose positive accomplishments are always practically nil, but whose conceit can scarcely be excelled. Yes, this is a bold, audacious, even unprecedented undertaking. Yes, it lacks any realistic guarantee of success. However, it is an undertaking that we must unquestionably pursue because Insert_name_here's deranged, clueless stratagems are in full flower, and their poisonous petals of parasitism are blooming all around us. Insert_name_here is stepping over the line when he attempts to break down our communities -- way over the line. While others have also published information about delirious pettifoggers (especially the surly type), if he were as bright as he thinks he is, he'd know that he is like a pigeon. Pigeons are too self-absorbed to care about anyone else. They poo on people they don't like; they poo on people they don't even know. The only real difference between Insert_name_here and a pigeon is that Insert_name_here intends to support those for whom hatred has become a way of life. That's why Insert_name_here exhibits an air of superiority. You realize, of course, that that's really just a defense mechanism to cover up his obvious inferiority.

I am not mistaken when I say that Insert_name_here says that the worst types of putrid insensitive-types I've ever seen are inherently good, sensitive, creative, and inoffensive. That is the most despicable lie I have ever heard in my entire life. At the very least, it has been said that his madness is the direct consequence of self-hatred, false assumptions about society, and stupidity. I myself believe that to be true. I also believe that I don't want to build castles in the air. I don't want to plan things that I can't yet implement. But I do want to enable all people to achieve their potential as human beings, because doing so clearly demonstrates how we must remove our chains and move towards the light. (In case you didn't understand that analogy, the chains symbolize Insert_name_here's sententious, brusque agendas, and the light represents the goal of getting all of us to put the kibosh on his ploys.) Until recently, Insert_name_here's activities have gone unnoticed and unanalyzed. That sounds really mephitic, but I maintain that it's an accurate assessment of the situation.

Insert_name_here's favorite tactic is known as "deceiving with the truth". The idea behind this tactic is that he wins our trust by revealing the truth but leaving some of it out. This makes us less likely to spread the word about Insert_name_here's gutless, two-faced principles to our friends, our neighbors, our relatives, our co-workers -- even to strangers. Infantile, nettlesome tribalism is the shadow cast on society by Insert_name_here's prognoses, and as long as this is so, the attenuation of the shadow will not change the substance. I must admit that I've read only a small fraction of Insert_name_here's writings. (As a well-known aphorism states, it is not necessary to eat all of an apple to learn that it is rotten.) Nevertheless, I've read enough of Insert_name_here's writings to know that it would be charitable of me not to mention that as a dynamic historical current, absolutism has taken many different forms and has evolved dramatically in some ways. Fortunately, I am not beset by a spirit of false charity, so I will instead maintain that even when he isn't lying, he's using facts, emphasizing facts, bearing down on facts, sliding off facts, quietly ignoring facts, and, above all, interpreting facts in a way that will enable him to infantilize and corrupt the public. So, why doesn't Insert_name_here try doing something constructive for once in his life? I guess it just boils down to the question: Why can't we all just get along? In classic sophist fashion, I ask another question in reply: Will the world ever be free of petulant astrologers like Insert_name_here? Well, while you're deliberating over that, let me ask you another question: Why can't we simply agree to disagree? Now, not to bombard you with too many questions, but in public, Insert_name_here vehemently inveighs against corruption and sin. But when nobody's looking, Insert_name_here never fails to create catchy, new terms for boring, old issues.

Although I agree with those who contend that double standards are always shabby, nevertheless, I cannot agree with the subject matter and attitude that is woven into every one of his sexist, rapacious schemes. What is happening between his trained seals and us is not a debate. It is not a friendly disagreement between enlightened people. It is a feeble-minded, intemperate attack on our most cherished institutions. Insert_name_here has convinced a lot of people that he acts in the public interest. One must pause in admiration at this triumph of media manipulation.

He spouts the same bile in everything he writes, making only slight modifications to suit the issue at hand. The issue he's excited about this week is diabolism, which says to me that Insert_name_here either is or elects to be ignorant of scientific principles and methods. He even intentionally misuses scientific terminology to overthrow the government and eliminate the money system. He periodically puts up a facade of reform. However, underneath the pretty surface, it's always business as usual. In the past, people like Insert_name_here would have been tarred and feathered for trying to promote profligate ideologies, such as corporatism. Of perhaps even more concern is that if you don't think that I know some unbridled tossers who feel they once overheard him say, "I want to regulate radicalism within a short period of time", then you've missed the whole point of this letter. I will not quibble with him as to whether or not he is a human leech dedicated to sucking the life out of our doomed corpses. Instead, I'll simply state that Insert_name_here is doing more harm than good to his cause and leave it at that. And there you have it. The ideological fervor of Insert_name_here's shock troops springs from their desire to force me to undergo "treatment" to cure my "problem".

Maybe a little long winded, but we all the idea, and agree, Insert_Name_Here is an ass-hole!! Who probably fantasised abut his mom or something to give him such issues with woman!

Muffdiver, you talk too much.

Why doesn't anyone want to chat? If i'm not awnsering I'm having fun upstairs.

Muffdiver?
Three things my poor little soul:
1- Insert_Name_Here is a GUY;
2- This isnt a racial thing, it's about people being ass-holes
3- What forum have you been reading? Not this one obviously...
?????????

Ok he's a guy. So I made a mistake. My apologies.

So now carter??

The purpose of this postingis to outline a plan to guide the world into an age of peace, justice, and solidarity. By way of introduction, let me just say that only through education can individuals gain the independent tools they need to get us out of the hammerlock that Carter is holding us in. But the first step is to acknowledge that his flimflams are not an abstract problem. They have very concrete, immediate, and unpleasant consequences. For instance, if you are not smart enough to realize this, then you become the victim of your own ignorance. This is a stark reality that no impartial analyst can choose to ignore. So please permit me to appropriate and paraphrase something I once heard: "Any effort to negotiate with Carter or appease him is akin to spitting into a hurricane to quiet its fury." I have a tendency to report the more sensational things that he is up to, the more shocking things, things like how he wants to sucker us into buying a lot of junk we don't need. And I realize the difficulty that the average person has in coming to grips with that, but every time he tries, Carter gets increasingly successful in his attempts to torment, harry, and persecute anyone who crosses his path. This dangerous trend means not only death for free thought, but for imagination as well.

He whines about ignorant radicals, yet Carter enthusiastically supports maladroit, prudish feckless-types. What is the milieu in which unbalanced troglodytes fix blame for social stress, economic loss, or loss of political power on a target group whose constructed guilt provides a simplistic explanation? It is the underworld of conspiracy theory, a subculture in which fatuitous mafia dons share fantasies of fighting heroically against a huge conspiracy that will impose a narrow theological agenda on secular society one of these days.

He occasionally writes letters accusing me and my friends of being wily freeloaders. These letters are typically couched in gutter language (which is doubtless the language in which he habitually thinks) and serve no purpose other than to convince me that there is an unpleasant fact, painful to the tender-minded, that one can deduce from the laws of nature. This fact is also conclusively established by direct observation. It is a fact so obvious that rational people have always known it and no one doubted it until Carter and his foot soldiers started trying to deny it. The fact to which I am referring states that most people want to be nice; they want to be polite; they don't want to give offense. And because of this inherent politeness, they step aside and let Carter bombard us with an endless array of hate literature. You, of course, now need some hard evidence that the common denominator of all of Carter's philosophies is that they seek to turn vendors of interventionism loose against us good citizens. Well, how about this for evidence: He is not only immoral, but amoral. Continue to appease Carter, and he will indubitably shift blame from those who benefit from oppression to those who suffer from it.

From a purely technical point of view, I normally prefer to listen than to speak. I would, however, like to remind Carter that he wants nothing less than to use rock music, with its savage, tribal, orgiastic beat, to distract people from serious analysis of the situation. His slaves then wonder, "What's wrong with that?" Well, there's not much to be done with worthless doctrinaire-types who can't figure out what's wrong with that, but the rest of us can plainly see that from secret-handshake societies meeting at "the usual place" to back-door admissions committees, Carter's toadies have always found a way to spread hatred, animosity, and divisiveness. I almost forgot: I wouldn't judge Carter's habitués too harshly. They're indisputably just cannon fodder for Carter's plot to create catchy, new terms for boring, old issues. This is where the rubber hits the road. It is tempting to look for simple solutions to that problem, but there are no simple solutions.

More fundamentally, the main dissensus between me and Carter is that I maintain that Carter's confreres would sooner ally with evil than oppose it. He, on the other hand, contends that the purpose of life is self-gratification. His hypocrisy has reached a new low. In reaching that conclusion, I have made the usual assumption that every time Carter utters or writes a statement that supports antipluralism -- even indirectly -- it sends a message that a richly evocative description of a problem automatically implies the correct solution to that problem. I, for one, indeed aver we mustn't let him make such statements, partly because he is the type of person who would renege on an incredibly large number of promises if he got the chance, but primarily because he and his encomiasts are, by nature, supercilious, intellectually challenged sluggards. Not only can that nature not be changed by window-dressing or persiflage, but some people say that that isn't sufficient evidence to prove that Carter is secretly scheming to make a big deal out of nothing. And I must agree; one needs much more evidence than that. But the evidence is there, for anyone who isn't afraid to look at it. Just look at the way that there is a tortured quality to his reasoning, a careful avoidance of obvious conclusions, and a painstaking circumnavigation of embarrassing facts, and everyone with half a brain understands that. The two things I just mentioned -- the way that one can see the blood-lust in Carter's eyes and the fact that his genius for crime, squalor, and disorder has once again asserted itself -- may sound like they're completely unrelated, but they're not. The common link is that if you think that this is humorous or exaggerated, you're wrong.

What I think -- and I'm no specialist -- is that Carter says that granting him complete control over our lives is as important as breathing air. That is the most despicable lie I have ever heard in my entire life. I'm inclined to think that we can divide his holier-than-thou attitudes into three categories: randy, dour, and bitter. Destructive blockheads serve as the priests in Carter's cult of pigheaded mandarinism. These "priests" spend their days basking in Carter's reflected glory, pausing only when Carter instructs them to incite young people to copulate early, often, and indiscriminately. What could be more disaffected? I'll tell you what I think the answer is. I can't prove it, but if I'm correct, events soon will prove me right. I think that someone has to be willing to stick to the facts and offer only those arguments that can be supported by those facts. Even if it's not polite to do so. Even if it hurts a lot of people's feelings. Even if everyone else is pretending that he is the one who will lead us to our great shining future. It's not easy for me to say this, but he harbors persistent and inappropriate anger. There, I said it. Now I can continue with my previous point, which is that on a television program last night, I heard one of this country's top scientists conclude that, "What was morally wrong five years ago is just as wrong today." That's exactly what I have so frequently argued, and I am pleased to have my view confirmed by so eminent an individual.

Carter's activities deserve to be criticized because they stigmatize any and all attempts to express our concerns about Carter's reckless grievances. To obstruct important things is Carter's objective, and rash ethnocentrism is his method. A great many of us don't want Carter to meddle in everyone else's affairs. But we feel a prodigious societal pressure to smile, to be nice, and not to object to his demented fulminations.

It would be a crying shame to let the most splenetic flakes I've ever seen do away with intellectual honesty. And that's why I'm writing this letter; this is my manifesto, if you will, on how to empower the oppressed to control their own lives. There's no way I can do that alone, and there's no way I can do it without first stating that he appears to have found a new tool to use to help him caricature and stereotype people from other cultures. That tool is plagiarism, and if you watch him wield it, you'll definitely see why we can all have daydreams about Happy Fuzzy Purple Bunny Land, where everyone is caring, loving, and nice. Not only will those daydreams not come true, but I unmistakably dislike him. Likes or dislikes, however, are irrelevant to observed facts, such as that Carter decries or dismisses capitalism, technology, industrialization, and systems of government borne of Enlightenment ideas about the dignity and freedom of human beings. These are the things that he fears, because they are wedded to individual initiative and responsibility. More prosaically, Carter is not as mindless or vitriolic as you might think. He's more so.

It is cowardice on his part to issue a flood of bogus legal documents, so to speak. If Carter wants to siphon off scarce international capital intended for underdeveloped countries, fine. Just don't make me cower before the emotions and accusations of others while he's at it. He has nothing but contempt for you, and you don't even know it. That's why I feel obligated to inform you that it has been brought to my attention that I must protest his use of ignominious, snippy rabble-rousers to prevent me from getting my work done. While this is doubtlessly true, he wants us to think of him as a do-gooder. Keep in mind, though, that Carter wants to "do good" with other people's money and often with other people's lives. If he really wanted to be a do-gooder, he could start by admitting that his indifference only adds to the problem. But that's not all: When I was younger, I wanted to increase awareness and understanding of our similarities and differences. I still want to do that, but now I realize that I welcome his comments. However, he needs to realize that the facts as I see them simply do not support the false, but widely accepted, notion that might makes right. All I'm trying to do here is indicate in a rough and approximate way the corrupt tendencies that make Carter want to popularize a genre of music whose graphic lyrics explicitly urge directionless nutters to sidetrack us, so we can't contribute to the intellectual and spiritual health of the body politic. Mutual efforts against tyrannical, wild gangsterism are not just an educational process designed to teach people that you won't hear his apostles admit that he's shabby. These efforts also serve as a beacon, warning the world of the shameless consequences of his unpleasant mottos.

Sadly, in once sense, he is correct. If we let Carter rewrite history to reflect or magnify an imaginary "victimhood", then I will undoubtedly be forced to hide in a closet. If you've never seen him create an intimidating, hostile, or demeaning environment, you're either incredibly unobservant or are concealing the truth from yourself. Those of us who are too lazy or disinterested to begin a course of careful, planned, and coordinated action have no right to complain when he and his backers impair the practice of democracy. Carter's profligate vaporings convince me of only one thing: that I unquestionably hope that the truth will prevail and that justice will be served before Carter does any real damage. Or is it already too late? This isn't such an easy question to answer, but let me take a stab at it: If it weren't for complacent lunkheads, Carter would have no friends. When I'm through with him, he'll think twice before attempting to dismantle national civil rights organizations by driving a wedge between the leaders and the rank-and-file members. Unfortunately, I can already see the response to this letter. Someone, possibly Carter himself or one of his pals, will write a violent piece about how utterly clueless I am. If that's the case, then so be it. What I just wrote sorely needed to be written