Total agreement with you guys ,the experiences we have with the different girls varies from punter to punter ,what does anyone gain from writing faking reviews ,everybody cant like everybody ,And as for me,i will continue to review girls based on my experience with them and follow other punters reviews when deciding on visiting a girl , i will just let the haters watch ,you know who you are

@cluso I hope you are not talking about me - but in any case, why don't you elaborate on your accusations of fake reviews by either Gary? and @Matobetsa, still waiting for that apology to Rene....

Having said that, I find the reviews very useful. I have never had a really bad punt from a woman who has received numerous good reviews by reviewers whose opinions I value, and often had spectacularly good punts. On the other hand, the majority of my 'disaster' punts have been where I used another site or tried a woman on this site without reviews. A friend of mine likes to say "Life is too short to drink bad wine" and I think the same goes for punting. I am grateful for every bad experience I have avoided through the review system, and even more grateful for some truly exceptional experiences that I have had, thanks to some of the reviews posted here.

LOL HATERS HEY,YA NEH

@Cluso
it is brave statements you are making about fake reviews without providing any details or proof. There is but no reason for the well known punters to post fake reviews and by now most (excluding a few you you..) regular punters know what reviews to trust. I only frown on reviews posted by people where the "punter" is new, and normaly only post once or twice and then dissappear.

I see no reason to question or even dabate reviews from regular reviewers.

@ Gary my apology to Rene in order.

@ Jimpel: Some of the your `well know punters `try to promote the girls by writing positive comments. ( to get better treatment at the next visit ? ). For myself, punting is a adventure. I do not visit wg`s with a lot of comments, for what ? to put review No. 27 into the forum ??? For me punting is adventure. Not knowing the place, the girl, the performance. That is the real thrill for me. Also rates what the girl charge does not bothering me at all. You get what you pay ( mostly ). So do not mix all punters, there are plenty who does not follow the trail of need a lot of positive comments first. I am punting now more the 3 years and had mostly positve experience without following the route of only try girls wich had been `approved`by well know punters. As also it was mentioned before that girls may react different to each punter, daliy mood, money ..... ) So i respect the `safe way`of most of the punters
but there is also punters which do not book girls with a lot of comments.

My point was not there is no value in the forum and feedback. Of course there is value in it, but the way some guys moan if a newbie writes a review is stupid. Nevertheless, what ever rocks your boats.

For the record, I wrote more reviews than I can even remember. Together with a few veteran punters I was part of that group to write some of the first ever reviews of WGs on the forum. I can't quite put my finger on it, but I don't know why but reviews aint the same any more. Still trying to figure it out why I lack the motivation to write reviews.... Soon maybe again... My last review was on Valentina, which I just HAD to write.

Good clarification LP. I also miss the old bold and honest reviews - but, not the crude, crass, guterall one's.

There are few enough JHB reviews these days, so retorting to reviews on vague suspicion etc is shooting ourselves in the foot. The more reviews - the more balanced decisons..

Don't nail newbey's for ungrounded reasons. The retorts are often more suspicious than the review - "sclooping up to WG's" or being spiteful??? (Some newbey's are trusted reviewers banned for commercial, rather than offensive reasons). I know!!

As for Gary_g - he has been the resident expert on BG's forever & his input is beyond suspicion.

@Cluso, I can only speak for myself, but I see women under a different name than my forum name. The 'special' treatment I crave is from really pleasing the woman that I'm with; I really wouldn't want special treatment for something that I wrote. Reviews are for fellow punters, to help make choices of who to see and who not to see easier.

But I have sympathy with your view of not wanting to write reviews of women who are already well-reviewed: Valentina certainly needs no endorsement from me, and for those who have good memories, Katie/Rene (petite blond) needed no review from me (unbelievably good lover, like having a pornstar girlfriend!), in spite of me seeing her quite a few times before she left the business. Ditto for Andrea (I wish I had met her as a friend, she has one of the most fabulous, quicksilver minds, and as good as she was in bed, I think I actually enjoyed her out of bed more), Arizona (who I won't see anymore, but only to honour the fact that she is not comfortable with punters who see other races), and, of course, she who cannot be named. I also try and submit reviews more in the budget range, because one has expectations that are, generally, reasonably well met in the upper price brackets (although I find the undoubted professionalism of many of the upper bracket women often borders on impersonal).

@Dayrider: "Good clarification LP. I also miss the old bold and honest reviews - but, not the crude, crass, guterall one's."

But Punters and their tastes/preferences/kinks will remain versatile and different from one another.

Personally I couldn't care whether some guys prefer to remain vague or be completely crude, crass or guterall, or just plain old rof grof en fokken onbeskof in their reviews. This is an adult site, and the sensitive punters should simply not read the reviews they deem to be explicit. I still revel in the irony of guys taking offense to a punter saying "crass" things yet have no qualms with paying for sex with prostitutes. I however do agree with the punter (Havata?) who mentioned that there is nothing worse than a wimpering snitch on an adult forum.

@Gary_g: I fully agree with your views on reviews. I also punt under 2/3 different names and never mention that I will write a review when I visit a WG for the first time. I remember Katie/Rene very well. She like Lana, also appeared on the Felicia show back in the day. She was the one with the heavy scaring on her stomach and was a greek expert. Havata would have loved her.

Oh, and just like WGs say they don't see other races, so should you claim not to cross the colour barrier as well :-)