This issue is a double edged sword. The scammers must be exposed. On the other hand pointless sugarcoated reviews is also shit. I don't review if a lady already has 10 pages of good reviews.

I know which review Shelley is referring to, and I also posted a comment on that review becoz the guy over exaggerated.

I agree that not all punters can have the exact same experience with the same WG.

Im in favour of honesty, and don't want to see excessively crude and demeaning comments.

Also there's a new phenomenon I like to refer to as the "Kickass" factor. This is where I've (and im sure other punters) have experienced rushed/boring/downright shit service with a particular WG. Enter Kickass and his magic and suddenly the WG fucks for the A-team. Examples are Rossia, Minette, and recently Michelle at SP for me. Then again I love and worship the goddess "she who may not be named" and Im glad she is back, but there were punters who really hated her going so far as to call her a fat ugly pig.

Edit: Im also against censorship and ridiculous moderation.

@Shelley : i liked your analogy about PnP and washing machine.. Yes we all do that, but difference is that PnP replaces it for free and SP will charge you irrespective of quality of service provided...

PS: i have been with 3 times and i have loved every moment of it, but since i moved jobs it is difficult to visit you during the day time...

@love iam going to frame that post of ur lmao the kick ass factor I like.

I read the review too of the lady...it was awful. I cringed when i read it. That was uber malicious and nasty!!!!! It was totally uncalled for.

When you do a review, I think the set of questions that are there already is ample !
Requiring to add more is just wrong and it gives all punters academics or monkeys carte blanche….
Knowing that they are anonymous with their fake usernames which means don’t hold back….. be as disgusting as you possibly can be….

I wonder if that review has had any impact on her business or prefered clientele?? ESA should delete that review. Its not right and not fair on her.

Shelley, no matter what 'set of questions' are listed, if a guy wants to be nasty, he is going to be nasty. I have seen 'minimum post' requirement work wonders on many forums where people are restricted from abusing the rules etc.

Don't get me wrong, even a regular poster who has met the minimum post requirement can be a doos, but at least we all know who the doos is right ?

Hi Everyone

We do not tolerate disrespect. It goes directly against Rule #1. We are trying our best to keep things classy and respectful, but we have openly admitted on several occasions that we rely on the community to help us police forum posts that are not acceptable.

Our main business is to list advertisers and keep their details updated and we don't always have the time to police the forum. For this reason we went through the effort of coding a "Report this post" system. We have not received any reports from "review posts"

We tried searching for "hag" and "in mother Russia" but unfortunately could not find it. Please indicate which reviews you are referring to (or at least provide us with an advertiser name). We will promptly remove the review and place the user who made the post under moderation until 1 Jan 2060.

Could not disagree with you more Shelley. A review is by definition a subjective recounting of your experience and opinions. If ESA gets into the business of editing reviews then all hope for this site is lost. If 20 guys all day they didn't click with a girl well then maybe there's something there and she has an attitude problem. A review also says a lot about the reviewer and if guys are crude or mean people just ignore their reviews. But you are proposing pretty harsh censorship which is always a bad idea. If you get a bad review you feel is unjustified then how you defend yourself on the same public platform tells future punters moor about you than just an endless list of glowing sanitized and censored reviews that will all look and feel exactly the same because they are all reviewed and edited by the same people at ESA. Very bad idea in my opinion.

ESA Forum Admin - please tell us how many mods you have on this forum ?