On 2024-11-01 12:22:57 Pomi said:
On 2024-10-31 14:00:44 Russian Bridgitte said: I am surprised
Because ones ID needs to be shown when photos taken on one of the sites.
Even if one looks NOTHING like a minor...maybe to check one is not an illegal too?....considering trafficking.
Must be a scam, a misrepresentation and then when in discussion who knows what gets offered and said.
ESA photographers are not innocent as well. Last year there was a wave of ladies on this site who were clearly under 21 the youngest at the time was 17, her ad is still active btw . The silver lining i guess is that they weren't being trafficked or pimped out they did all by themselves but it still doesn't make it right
RB.
On 2024-11-01 09:56:50 Russian Bridgitte said:
On 2024-11-01 09:53:22 StepRx said: The owners and agents of those sites that allowed those adds should be held criminally liable in a court of law and should all if found guilty serve prison time.
Do scammers not also deserve to be found guilty and held liable?
Abetting extortion?
Crime is crime and the ripple affects are devastating.
RB.
On 2024-11-01 14:05:58 Teletubby said:
On 2024-11-01 09:56:50 Russian Bridgitte said: On 2024-11-01 09:53:22 StepRx said: The owners and agents of those sites that allowed those adds should be held criminally liable in a court of law and should all if found guilty serve prison time.
Do scammers not also deserve to be found guilty and held liable?
Abetting extortion?
Crime is crime and the ripple affects are devastating.
RB.
What exactly is the point of saying things like this?
"Person X did something terrible"
"... but Person Y also did something kak. Shouldn't they also be punished?"
Well, yes. Obviously. Literally nobody is saying they shouldn't be, so what does it have to do with the case at hand?
On 2024-11-01 16:56:43 R2D4 said:
Would be great if these websites calculated the age based on date of birth in ID instead of allowing WGs to lie about it. There are few 60+ year olds advertising as 51 and 41 yo.
On 2024-11-01 13:14:13 Russian Bridgitte said:
On 2024-11-01 12:22:57 Pomi said: On 2024-10-31 14:00:44 Russian Bridgitte said: I am surprised
Because ones ID needs to be shown when photos taken on one of the sites.
Even if one looks NOTHING like a minor...maybe to check one is not an illegal too?....considering trafficking.
Must be a scam, a misrepresentation and then when in discussion who knows what gets offered and said.
ESA photographers are not innocent as well. Last year there was a wave of ladies on this site who were clearly under 21 the youngest at the time was 17, her ad is still active btw . The silver lining i guess is that they weren't being trafficked or pimped out they did all by themselves but it still doesn't make it right
RB.
Hey Pomi
Just to clarify your post which you signed off with my initials.
In case others reading imagine I was aware of 17 year old advertising...
Could you shed light how you knew the youngest was 17years?
RB.
On 2024-11-01 14:05:58 Teletubby said:
On 2024-11-01 09:56:50 Russian Bridgitte said: On 2024-11-01 09:53:22 StepRx said: The owners and agents of those sites that allowed those adds should be held criminally liable in a court of law and should all if found guilty serve prison time.
Do scammers not also deserve to be found guilty and held liable?
Abetting extortion?
Crime is crime and the ripple affects are devastating.
RB.
What exactly is the point of saying things like this?
"Person X did something terrible"
"... but Person Y also did something kak. Shouldn't they also be punished?"
Well, yes. Obviously. Literally nobody is saying they shouldn't be, so what does it have to do with the case at hand?