Good morning LoveMonkey199

I'm a person who is always open to changing my mind. Since you were there, please just slowly go through exactly what happened. I really am curious to know the full details of what transpired.

Thanks.

What strikes me is that Shakira is angry at me for pointing out that she has a drinking problem, which almost all that know her can attest to, but not once has she denied what she was accused of or offered any kind of explanation. Instead she claims to bow out gracefully to supposedly stop others from being dragged down. That tells me nothing more then the fiesty Shakira, who normally fights tooth and nail, has actually bowed out because she is more guilty then concerned about any other lady on this site. Her anger is now directed at me for her fuck ups and exposure.

What she fails to realize is that her actions have now made Sharon the victim and overshadows anything she tried to do to my client.

On 2017-08-04 07:44:13 gary_g said:
Good morning LoveMonkey199

I'm a person who is always open to changing my mind. Since you were there, please just slowly go through exactly what happened. I really am curious to know the full details of what transpired.

Thanks.

Lovemonkey gave quite a detailed account of what happened on your thread Gary_G. You dismissed his account as untrustworthy because he's not an avid poster like yourself, so what more can he repeat to convince you?

On 2017-08-03 22:47:06 Syren @ The Doll House said:
@VF... maybe that's something you should try your hand at? You're certainly eloquent enough...I'll be an avid viewer of any soap opera you put together, and judging by the posts, you most definitely have the best stories to tell...xxx

Lol, if only Syren. Maybe I should approach a production company. Instead of writing a book, I can script a soap opera, lol.

@VF. Can we please put this subject at rest now. You are an angel and everyone knows that. She is banned and maybe turn a page will be better than keep on dwelling on this subject.

Indeed I did give a thorough indication about what I saw and heard. If you havnt changed your mind after reading what Shakira said then there is no way that I can change it by repeating myself. Yes I dont post a lot but when someone tries to cover the truth with their version of what they assume happened I will correct them if I was indeed there. And just something else...if Shakira is such great friends with the bar lady why was she banned from the restaurant and why was she asked to leave the poor girl alone after she offered the girl money in exchange to watch her being muffed...really? And to shout out the world that you are part of the drug squad and show people your gun? She might know people who work with the drugsquad but I highly doubt that shes part of them. She should watch herself as one day she might just threaten the wrong person and land herself in jail.

The drug squad has been dissolved as far as I'm aware. There is procedure to follow and I am well aware of what needs to be done in order to substantiate a raid. I heard from someone years ago that she's nothing more then an informant, but she claims to also be a sergeant or something in the cops and that her gun is government/police issue. Not sure of a lot, but announcing to the world that you work with the drug squad and waving a gun around in public while drunk is unbecoming of an officer and certainly destroys any credibility of her being reliable as either a police officer or informant. Cops don't tell people they are cops, especially when they are supposedly undercover.

Since LoveMonkey199 doesn't want to give more information, I guess what information as an 'eye witness' he has given has to be all we have to work with...

Firstly, I am glad you now admit that Sharon was doing what she was accused of doing. As to her regret? Makes zero difference to me: anyone who threatened wrecking families for money gets nothing but contempt from me. I hope others here feel the same. There is no possible excuse for this low-life behaviour.

Now Veronica came to your defense by saying I doubted your credibility by saying you haven't posted much. I invite you and everyone else to examine your posting history.

Post no. 1: praising Sharon's photo shoot
Posts no. 2 and 3: posting a link to Sharon's profile and posting in praise of her as an SP.
Post no. 4: another praising of Sharon's photo shoot
Post no. 6: complaining about overlapping names of SPs. I wonder if competition for 'your' Sharon was the problem: www.esa.co.za/escorts/viewEscort.php
Post no. 7 Praising Sharon's photo shoot
Post no. 8 Review of Sharon
Post no. 9 comment on a post by Sharon

This one is interesting, because it is response to Veronica posting this:

"Was about to type a thesis in response, but was reminded that you just wouldn't get it, so why bother? All I could think of while reading your response was a red faced Donald Duck throwing a tantrum and perhaps an LSD flashback from my teens. I sometimes over estimate the ability of some girls to comprehend certain concepts and forget to dumb down as per the usual comparitive stereotypes. Sorry I made that mistake with regards to you babe. My post was 'tongue in cheek' no need to get your diaper so knotted little one.

I can't communicate at your level or explain myself in a way you'll understand, because it'll fly right over your head."

post no. 10: commenting on a post where Sharon was running a hit and run special on a 'massage only' advert

post no. 11: comment agreeing with a positive remark about Sharon.

You can look for yourselves, all the posts are pretty much about Sharon or complaining about how hard life as a SP is.

He has never reviewed anyone but Sharon, and almost all his posts concern Sharon.

I would hardly call this a credible witness for the events that happened.

Tower333 was also there that day, but said "I left way before all this kicked off". He states that Shakira was drunk and loud, but the point is, the only person who disputes Shakira's account of what happened is LoveMonkey199, who is anything but unbiased.

It is sad that Veronica, in coming back onto the forum, did not choose to emphasize that the real villain here is Sharon. That point should have been pounded home again and again: Sharon tried to blackmail clients, according to Veronica.

That is despicable.

Shakira told me a different version of events, and, not having been there, I cannot say what really happened. No-one here can say that Shakira threatened Sharon, without choosing to believe LoveMonkey199. Read his (her) posts, and come to your own conclusions.

There are other discrepancies in the accounts of LoveMonkey199 and Sharon herself, in her communication with ESA. But I will wait to see if some other facts come to light. As to other allegations in this thread, I'll reserve comment for the moment.

But I'm glad you and Veronica are getting along so well now. You've forgiven her being one of, as you put it, "...some ladies have to stoop to such a low level just for a little attention. It actually just shows you that there are still people who think they have to bring people down so that they can feel better about themselves."

And to paraphrase American politician Barry Goldwater,

"I would remind you that extremism in the defense of freedom from being blackmailed is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue."

No matter what happened at that restaurant, I cannot feel even one iota of sympathy for Sharon.

Sharon certainly never deserved to be threatened with a gun and mine and Antoinette's names certainly did not deserve to be mixed in with her imaginary hit squad Gary_G. Sharon has not taken the blackmail any further and all should have been over when my client never reported anything with regards to Sharon following up on the blackmail. Who is Shakira to go into a public place, threaten anyone with a gun and lie about myself and Antoinette who never even mildly factored into any of this? All I asked was for a name to aid my client, not for Shakira to humiliate herself and threaten Sharon making this a bigger spectacle then necessary.

Then you attack Lovemonkeys credibility much like I would attack Oom Piets credibility with Paige and you attacked DIRECTORSSS for his credibility with regards to defending me. So what if he had a favorite? That makes him no less credible then anyone else on this forum with a favorite lady! Does that in the same token put DirectorSSS word in disrepute regarding her behaviour at Pharaoh's as a witness? Your arguments are a diversion tactic and not at all credible in this instance. Sharon maybe admitted she was wrong or regrets what she did to my client, as per Lovemonkeys words. Has there been any such apology or admission from Shakira in throwing myself and Antoinette under the bus in her fantasy?

Everything you say here is based on believing LoveMonkey199. You want to believe him (her)? Be my guest. I think any person who reads his(her) posts will come to a different conclusion.

I have never attacked DIRECTORSSS' credibility. I asked him why he took attacks on you personally, just like why he asked me why I took Shakira's banning personally. We answered each other civilly, and exchanged some thoughts privately. I happen to like him, from what I know of him from his postings and our communication. Please leave him out of this. It has no relationship with LoveMonkey199's credibility.

Whatever happened at Pharaohs is between you and Shakira. I don't really see it as relevant.

I am extremely uneasy with you cozying up to Sharon's defender. But if you're comfortable, fine. I just know, reading his(her) posts trying to rehabilitate Sharon, I think defending a scammer is nauseating.