Navigation
Yewrev1
Yewrev1 - Re: WG with poor standards but expensive
Re: WG with poor standards but expensive
Basic Member
Joined:
21 Nov 2017
Posts to Date: 214
View Profile
Posted: 2018-02-27 13:19:52

On 2018-02-27 12:49:00 Kitty said:
Also look at the first page of the comments on this topic. People were jumping to conclusions about this girl before she had a chance to respond... lets try hear both sides before sacrificing someone's rep and livelyhood. Since most seem to side with Shiona on this... im wondering if Grant will rethink his review?



Unfortunately for her, the review was done and it will be there for the rest of her career on Esa.

I am no Gyneacologist but do know a c&nt when I see one , and he qualifies as one.
nikula
nikula - Re: WG with poor standards but expensive
Re: WG with poor standards but expensive
Gold Member
Joined:
30 Dec 2011
Posts to Date: 50
View Profile
Posted: 2018-02-27 14:19:44

Audi Alteram Partem
[deleted]
[deleted] - Re: WG with poor standards but expensive
Re: WG with poor standards but expensive
Less than 40 posts
Posted: 2018-02-27 16:14:55

After reading this thread and taking both sides into account. I have come to this conclusion.

From his side

1 Yes she was running late, and should of taken it upon herself to call and let him know.

2 at the same time you (Grant) should of given her the benifit of the doubt. Only because she had to drive 300km take a shower change and be ready to see you at 12. And for 1000 buck. A little low for that travel and service.

From her side

1 she was not late you were early. You both traveled a distance to be there. Wait for her. Even 30mins extra is not that long.

2 dude you were gona get so lucky if she could make it up to you that day. Your loss.

So final verdict.

Im with her. You a Id ten tee.
Goolab
Goolab - Re: WG with poor standards but expensive
Re: WG with poor standards but expensive
Basic Member
Joined:
24 Feb 2018
Posts to Date: 7
View Profile
Posted: 2018-02-27 16:50:38

On 2018-02-27 09:32:44 Cabret said:


Because off your ungratefullness, and comments, her trying to defend herself she got banned off the site for a month, so how do you think she is suppose to support her children for a month, are you going to support her?






What? Why was Shiona banned for defending herself?
[deleted]
[deleted] - Re: WG with poor standards but expensive
Re: WG with poor standards but expensive
Less than 40 posts
Posted: 2018-02-27 18:22:03

Her ad is still running so maybe she is just banned from the forum. As much as we say the ladies lose business from the forum my understanding is that most members don't use it.

Grants this is just bad form, I hope you make it up to Shiona somehow especially if she made the effort to travel nearly 7 times the distance you did to honour the booking.
suzook
suzook - Re: WG with poor standards but expensive
Re: WG with poor standards but expensive
Basic Member
Joined:
1 Feb 2010
Posts to Date: 305
View Profile
Posted: 2018-02-27 18:22:56
Edited: 2018-02-27 18:23:29

Grants, given that both parties have expressed themselves openly, it was wrong of you to come on here and go on about it like a little girlie without giving the SP a fair chance to explain ...

So to you i would say (in your own little girlie words)

"toemaar poppie kry jou ry"
Cabret
Cabret - Re: WG with poor standards but expensive
Re: WG with poor standards but expensive
Advertiser
Joined:
22 Nov 2016
Posts to Date: 81
  View Profile  
Posted: 2018-02-27 22:37:23

YES, GOOLAB, SADLY SHIONA GOT BANNED OF THE SITE BECAUSE SHE ONLY QUOTED THE CONVERSATION AS IT WAS ON THE PHONE IN AFRIKAANS, AND BECAUSE OFF THAT THEY BANNED HER, WITHOUT ANY RECONSIDERATION IN ANY WAY TO UNBANN HER.
Goolab
Goolab - Re: WG with poor standards but expensive
Re: WG with poor standards but expensive
Basic Member
Joined:
24 Feb 2018
Posts to Date: 10
View Profile
Posted: 2018-02-27 22:49:21

Feelin sorry for Shiona but best to hit salt.
So we'll be seeing suzook version 2 then, since he wrote in Africaans.
Johnlennon
Johnlennon - Re: WG with poor standards but expensive
Re: WG with poor standards but expensive
Basic Member
Joined:
21 Nov 2017
Posts to Date: 47
View Profile
Posted: 2018-02-28 09:30:00

Wow that's harsh to be banned like that.

Grant should be ashamed of himself.
I thought her responses were very professional and sincere.
He should have accepted her apology and carried on with her life.
Kitty
Kitty - Re: WG with poor standards but expensive
Re: WG with poor standards but expensive
Advertiser
Joined:
11 May 2016
Posts to Date: 284
  View Profile  
Posted: 2018-02-28 09:49:18

Lets start a 'GoFuckMe' account for her. Its like GoFundMe except punters book and have a good time with her ;)

Reply

You must be logged in to post on this forum. Basic Membership is free and it only takes a minute to sign up. Alternatively, if you are already a member, please log in. You will be automatically returned to this page.

Legend


Hover mouse over icons for description

Back to Previous Page
For the best browsing experience, rotate your tablet horizontal.