Tedious he may be, but sheepish not he.

I have said before that I keep everything, emails, texts, WhatsApps and even PM's. I would never say something like that to ESA or anyone else without proof. I have no reason to lie about petty crap and if Sharon had been successful at extorting money from my client, that is what I would have posted from the onset. I cannot prove what ESA says,because I never said it so I guess I'm banned!

On 2017-09-18 21:42:42 DD1982 said:
I always wonder why Esa get involved in this sort of kak. All they do is shoot their own credibility to shit. All they appear to have is an accusation that an accusation was made - and then they demand that whoever made the alleged accusation must prove it (whether they made it or not). Basically they just pick a side and then pretend like they're some sort of impartial judge, when they act like anything but.

Sure, Shakira has a history of BS. But so does everyone else in this story, so that's hardly a basis for deciding what to believe.

The clients made ESA responsible for advertising con artists and thieves long ago. Damned if they do, damned if they don't.

Nope, not damned if they do. It's quite easy to say "we don't have enough evidence to make a determination one way or the other". Clients don't expect them to be omniscient. If there is evidence, then act. If there are just accusations and counter-accusations, don't put an impossible burden of proof on one (apparently randomly selected) side and threaten them with banning if they fail to meet it.

What baffles me is that ESA could state that to Sharon without proof and it's now on my head, having no clue where it came from. I took it that ESA had received other complaints from other clients which is why I never questioned it, but now that statement is being put over my head! Clearly a mistake has been made but R60000 is a very specific figure to suck out of one's thumb!

On 2017-09-18 21:34:03 Veronica Franco said:
Leave him DIRECTORSSS, he's trying to antagonize me like a 5 year old! Probably another keyboard poepol with an axe to grind.

.

Sit Stay, good dog

On 2017-09-12 22:00:35 Veronica Franco said:
Thought this was an adult site? Indeed, we are all just grown up kids with way to much experience in pretending to be what we claim to be 'adult'.

On 2017-09-18 22:23:03 Kingsman said:
On 2017-09-18 21:34:03 Veronica Franco said: Leave him DIRECTORSSS, he's trying to antagonize me like a 5 year old! Probably another keyboard poepol with an axe to grind. .

Sit Stay, good dog

On 2017-09-12 22:00:35 Veronica Franco said: Thought this was an adult site? Indeed, we are all just grown up kids with way to much experience in pretending to be what we claim to be 'adult'.

Yup, this is one big schoolyard!

Woof woof. Down boy !

On 2017-09-18 08:42:15 ESA Forum Admin said:
Dear Veronica

Sharon has made contact and insists she did not steal R70k from your client. If parties on the forum recall the robbed client was the pinnacle of the Shakira, Veronica and Sharon and assassins debacle.

Sadly if ESA is not provided with proof that your client was indeed robbed of R70k by Sharon we are left with no choice but to ban you from further advertising with us. Yes we know how this will go, "I would rather be banned than expose my client", if that the way it needs to go then so be it. Shakira is a pathological liar she has always been and will always be a pathological liar. Sharon is always the victim, you madam should know better.

To gary_g all appeals to have anyone returned to ESA are denied in advance.

Mat
ESA Forum Admin

Did VF say her client was robbed?. Unless 'attempted extortion' equals robbery??? After going through all the threads, all i saw was Veronica alleging of attempted blackmail/extortion by Sharon.

All I saw in all this post was Miss V saying that Sharon is trying to blackmail her client
:(