On 2022-01-21 18:31:02 Miss Red (aka Louise) said:
On 2022-01-21 18:14:11 Vrik said: Will it be an option to take the girl out of the industry and she gets another job? And then the man stands in for her loss in income (as she might earn less)?
But i dont buy this thing that the girl must now be fully provided by the man....
Definitely would be the beter option as you suggest...as I don't think any woman that has been use to earning her own money would want to be souly dependent on a man.
On 2022-01-21 18:14:11 Vrik said:
Will it be an option to take the girl out of the industry and she gets another job? And then the man stands in for her loss in income (as she might earn less)?
But i dont buy this thing that the girl must now be fully provided by the man....
Definitely would be the beter option as you suggest...as I don't think any woman that has been use to earning her own money would want to be souly dependent on a man.
But not many men can afford that even.
So say lady x charged 1500 an appointment and she takes home 1000 per appointment the rest is venue costs. Let's be funny and say she only sees 2 clients every day for 22 days of the month. Over 22 days her earnings would be 44 000.
Now she gets a cashier job that she earns 6000 or a admin job where she earns 10 000. That is a 34000 drop in income.
Ok she don't pay rent no more as she lives with you deduct 10 even 15 000 of that.
That is still a 19 000 gap that needs to be filled. Take 9000 for her keep- food ,laundry, utilities basic everyday needs. That leaves 10000 that you still need to substitute.
Now she has a "income" of 20 000( your 10 000 and her pa jobs 10 000, that needs to go where? Pay her car, policies, clothing, hair nails, support her family(most SPs do)? none of that income will go back into the "household". You are still carrying all the costs except for her personal things as mentioned above that she will pay from her now income?
If she still stays apart form you it still leaves 34 000 that you want to substitute? Not many men can afford to give her that.
This is not easy. It will take two very dedicated people to make this work. Because one way or the other you will be the main provider even if you want to just substitute her lost income or outright take care of all her financial needs.
As for the comment of ladies being to good for low paying jobs. Its not about being to good it is about being use to a certain standard of income and living. No one wants to go in reverse gear..;)
I want to see a CEO of his own company(which ladies are, hehehe) revert to being the mail boy or doorman and live on that salary, after being use to being the CEO and standard of living that comes with that.