Nothing Kickass , just stating a fact to help out punters to put in perspective about the ulterior motive so that they can make an informed choice . Why you have to be so touchy about anything I say ?

I get what you are all saying and I have to be honest I’m glad it’s not my job to mediate the comments and reviews.

I do get offended easily and that’s maybe cause I am a “lady” and have decided to only worry about myself and “try” stop reading other peoples reviews….lol

Because u the only parkie doos that gets on my blady nerves its not what u say its the fact that I pic ur face and thats what actually gets to me.

I've never written a review per se, but I did give feedback numerous times on threads dealing with my favorate pass time, namely muffing. I provided feedback on ladies who love it and who dont mind punters like me who dont even get undressed but rather dive straigt in to dine at the y for an hour or two. However, no punter reciprocated, and no other muff loving punter said thanks buddy for the headsup or even shared info.

So I simply stopped giving feedback and continued on my own enjoying eating as much pussy as what I can as frequently as I can afford to do so. Being the King of Muffing is my reason for living and i no longer feel the need to share info with punters who dont like to muff as it were.

I cannot wait for my first visit for 2014 at HOE and other independent stunners who I hope will be ready for me, because this year I'm not dieting baby!

It all boils down to the behaviour of the lady . Discounting the outright malicious reviews , most negative reviews stems out of the apparent indifference shown by the lady in question . I have seen ladies who have bodies which the narcissistic world might term as imperfect , yet the reviews by experienced punters will term her as a mature goddess . The reason will be nothing but exceptional service . If the lady cheats him by shortcoming on various fronts then the same lady might transform into that infamous "old hag with drooping boobs" . The unkind words more or less are byproducts of anger stemming from the fact that after paying premium the lonely guy is receiving a less than average service . It is quite ironic that what he looked for stress relief turned out in only aggravating the current situation . The sum total of this pent up anger will result in an angry tirade .

That said I always feel that a review must be written after careful deliberation . If even after that you still want to call her "an old hag" she probably deserves it .

For guys who are reading these kind of reviews , use the previous ones (if any) . The insults should not be taken at face value but should be used to gauge the anger level of that guy . By no means an exact science but if you see carefully then you can see the telltale signs of a genuine or malicious review and then can take an informed choice .

That initial review of the lady in question that Shelly is referring to was really harsh in an uncalled for manner. I know that WG for many years, and I never had any issues whatsoever with her service. She does have stretchmarks, but the guy who posted that review was simply exaggerating in a shit manner.

As for Kick and his magic touch, I can understand he's got game.... but I still have my doubts regarding Michelle!

Suggestion to ESA moderators.

I know its your site snd can do whatever the fuck, but please before you relegate any punter to moderation bin at least make a post on the forum to say that so and so punter is being placed under moderation for the following transgression. ............

in this way the community can learn from it. Yourselves said some things are grey areas. So at least the rest of the punters can debate and discuss.

For example, I now assume that the reason for my moderation is becoz I mentioned in passing that she who may not be named is back. It cannot be the rape story since I didn't mention names and I only asked if anyone else heard about it, not for confirmation of who it was since I already knew.

@lovemetender:

Regarding your post to the ESA moderators. After today I've decided that we will approach moderation on a very mechanical and fast paced manner. The process of deciding who must go into moderation is extremely disruptive. Trying to puzzle together who said what is simply too time consuming.

From today, if we suspect the slightest bit of trouble brewing, a user will go into moderation. From now on moderation will *not* be meant as a punishment (which in all truth was the initial idea) but as a way for us to manage potential trouble in the forum. If anyone posts a hot topic, even if it is 100% within the rules of ESA, we want to place that user under moderation, even if it is just for a day. Simply put, we don't want things to get out of hand.

We ourselves absolutely hate this whole moderation thing, but as we've seen countless times, it is required. We off course WILL miss posts, and that is why we are calling on the community to use the "Report this post". You're right there... you just read the whole thing. Please just let us know something is up.

So to answer your question: you are currently under no-punishment-intended moderation for having a recent conversation about religion. That is what I would classify as potential trouble brewing. It takes just one guy to say something in retaliation and then we have a full blown fight. By having one party under moderation we can see the fight starting in our moderation interface and immediately stop it right in it's tracks.

We will do our best to move these posts out of moderation as quickly as possible.

Fair enough. But how does one distinguish between a fight/argument and an honest debate or discussion challenging social norms? Most of us all know and can see there is a huge difference between a debate and malicious trolling.

Lets take a step back and recognise this website as bluntly as possible - I.e. its about a bunch of punters looking for paid for sex. I personally like the idea of this forum being all encompassing regarding sexual matters and topics, even if it skirts sensitive issues like for example married punters with loving wives out punting, broke family guys feeding their pussy addiction using little Johnny's school fees, punters punting or being a WG while hiv positive, and of course interpretive religious takes on matters sexual. Sometimes discussions and interpretations that challenges our core believes make for intense debates. Some weaklings will cry foul, while those with a bit more gumption will argue their points intellectualy.

Btw, My response to Classhole is still missing.

Yes. I saw that post to Classhole and decided it was getting too heated. I deleted it. We'll figure out a system where instead of just deleting a post it can come back to you so you can edit it again and resubmit it.