On 2017-09-18 22:31:14 Placido said:
Woof woof. Down boy !

You deserve a booooooyyyaaaaa...

Singing akon's song
Sorry you can put the blame on me
You can put the blame on me
You can put the blame on me

Climax says,

On 2017-09-18 22:31:14 Placido said:
Woof woof. Down boy !

"You deserve a booooooyyyaaaaa..."

Heeeeeehaaaaaa.....

At last !

Now back to the matter at hand :
He said, she said ...

There's not much more that can be said from my side! The ball lies in ESA's court. I have stated my case!

I would like to enquire though if this was something said during the argument between Shakira and Sharon or was Sharon told by ESA that she would not receive a refund because she got money from my client? Surely if I had said this to ESA, they should have asked me to state it in an email and would have enquired from said client if this was indeed the case before stating such to Sharon? So much about this is left up in the air. What motives could I possibly have to state in writing that Sharon attempted to blackmail my client if she had indeed succeeded in doing so? This is all so ludicrous.

On 2017-09-18 22:23:03 Kingsman said:
On 2017-09-18 21:34:03 Veronica Franco said: Leave him DIRECTORSSS, he's trying to antagonize me like a 5 year old! Probably another keyboard poepol with an axe to grind. .

Sit Stay, good dog

On 2017-09-12 22:00:35 Veronica Franco said: Thought this was an adult site? Indeed, we are all just grown up kids with way to much experience in pretending to be what we claim to be 'adult'.

What are you saying/implying Kingsman?

I am still baffled why an advertising site would get involved in a "he said she said" between wg's. ESA should just say that people should take these tiffs offline if they deem it inappropriate and if mud is still being thrown ban them. Or close threads that do not add value to what we are all here to do if ESA deems it fit, it's their site and forum after all. But ESA somehow appointed itself as the arbiter over all and everything that happens in the adultworld. It doesn't assist punters nor wg's so I don't understand the reasoning, other than "because we can." Nanny-state stuff.

I share Vegas's sentiments. Why does esa get involved in these "he said she said" fights? Ok granted, Miss V was trying to help a punter who was allegedly being bribed and informed esa of the extortion, but that's where it should've ended. Sharon seems to be a constant thorn in everyone's side and just when things are calming down, she makes another call and everything blows up again. Enough already seriously!
I've been reading these essays of threads over the last few months and I don't know why esa indulge these fights and/or name-slinging from all the parties concerned (which was done in their private capacity).
We should be on esa (forum) to advertise services and punters to search for them.. Just my humblest opinion.
MR

Maybe just maybe, if some the wgs involved in this saga did not advertise on this site, ESA management wouldn't give a damn.

On 2017-09-19 06:31:55 Jaco45 said:
Maybe just maybe, if all the wgs involved did not advertise on this site, ESA management wouldn't give a damn.

I have been upfront in all my dealings and postings on and to ESA. Your insinuation that I get banned is based purely on you not liking me, nothing more. I hope that ESA is more logical and fair in this regard then you are.