Kersey, is that you ?

On 2017-03-10 08:22:45 honeybear said:
Kersey, is that you ?

Huh?

Dear Looney0316

This is our 17th year of operation, in that time one gets an inkling of people and their motives.

You sir came onto this forum with claims of helping other punters, you then become overbearing, pushy, demanding and badgering. You then make a statement that you done, so you dont really have an interest in the punter community its all about YOU and all about revenge.

Now that you have your revenge I hope you pleased with yourself.

Eddie
ESA SUPPORT

On 2017-03-10 08:38:41 ESA SUPPORT said:
Dear Looney0316

This is our 17th year of operation, in that time one gets an inkling of people and their motives.

You sir came onto this forum with claims of helping other punters, you then become overbearing, pushy, demanding and badgering. You then make a statement that you done, so you dont really have an interest in the punter community its all about YOU and all about revenge.

Now that you have your revenge I hope you pleased with yourself.

Eddie
ESA SUPPORT

Hi Eddie,

That is incorrect, as I mentioned from the beginning when I was questioned on why I created a new account and not use the old one and with regards to the rules and procedures on ESA, I specifically said that I am not a regular and hardcore punter like most of the people here which means that I don't use the forums and that I am just a browser that looks for ladies to see on occasion (thats what this site was created for).

As a non regular punter, I do not feel it is necessary for me to be an active forum member and spend my time on these forums when I should be running my business (I am constantly on the road and do not have the time in any case).

If you feel that I became overbearing, pushy, demanding and badgering, then I apologize for that. I was simply trying to ascertain how these types of situations are handled (specifically when proof is unable to be provided from one of the parties involved). In addition, I found myself having to prove myself to not only yourself but also to all the users of ESA. Questions and/or attacks were thrown at me and in order to further prove that I wasn't what everyone thought I was, I continued to respond to other posters.

I admit that things got a little heated the other day, that was simply because I was already starting to get agitated by all the negativity and again, if you felt my responses to you were arrogant then I apologize.

This was not about revenge, not at all. In fact, I had no intention of even trying to get Sammy Lee banned from this site (all I mentioned was that she shouldn't be allowed to be on this site). I came on the forum to warn everyone and then I was advised that I needed to contact ESA head office with proof. From that, I realized that the only way I could get people to believe my story and to take it seriously was to prove myself legit, which is exactly what I have been trying to do. Whether or not you ban her is up to you. It goes without saying that by me providing you proof that the outcome would possibly result in banning.

I am not one to stir sh#t for no reason. I simply believe in doing the right thing and as you can see, there are punters that are appreciative of my warning. To me, that is good enough, to know that there are those punters who have read my story and will now think twice before booking with Sammy Lee. Whether or not they listen to my advice is up to them, but I have done my part.

If you feel that my motives were malicious then again, I am more then happy to discuss this matter with you telephonically in private.

On 2017-03-10 09:16:08 Looney0316 said:


This was not about revenge, not at all. In fact, I had no intention of even trying to get Sammy Lee banned from this site (all I mentioned was that she shouldn't be allowed to be on this site).

This new trumpian world.
You contradict yourself in the same sentence.

On 2017-03-06 16:09:45 Looney0316 said:
Hi everyone.

This is a new account I have created as I am not really one to post on the forums.

I decided to create this account to warn everyone about Sammy Lee:

www.esa.co.za/escorts/viewEscort.php

She is a scammer and stole R500 from me. There is no need to go into the details because it was my fault for falling for this scam. I am not the one to cry over R500 as its really not a big deal for me. This is just a warning to all the users on this forum to stay away from Sammy Lee and avoid being scammed by her.

In my opinion, she should be banned from advertising on ESA. I hope the admins of ESA will remove her from this site.

you said BANNED ffs

On 2017-03-10 10:08:34 Yoni said:
On 2017-03-10 09:16:08 Looney0316 said:

This was not about revenge, not at all. In fact, I had no intention of even trying to get Sammy Lee banned from this site (all I mentioned was that she shouldn't be allowed to be on this site).

This new trumpian world.
You contradict yourself in the same sentence.

How am I contradicting myself? I said that I didn't come on the forum with the sole intention of getting her banned, I only gave my opinion that she shouldn't be allowed here. That's not the same thing. I didn't come here and say ban her ban her ban her. Giving an opinion is not the same as demanding.

On 2017-03-10 10:27:10 Looney0316 said:
On 2017-03-10 10:08:34 Yoni said: On 2017-03-10 09:16:08 Looney0316 said:

This was not about revenge, not at all. In fact, I had no intention of even trying to get Sammy Lee banned from this site (all I mentioned was that she shouldn't be allowed to be on this site).

This new trumpian world.
You contradict yourself in the same sentence.

How am I contradicting myself? I said that I didn't come on the forum with the sole intention of getting her banned, I only gave my opinion that she shouldn't be allowed here. That's not the same thing. I didn't come here and say ban her ban her ban her. Giving an opinion is not the same as demanding.

Saying she should be banned is exactly the same as saying she shouldnt be allowed to advertise on the site. How do you prevent someone from advertising on the site? You ban them no?

If I had said "She must be banned", that is a demand. But that's not what I said, read again, I said "In my opinion she should be banned from advertising on ESA.

Please also remember that from the beginning I was advised to contact head office and provide proof. It goes without saying that contacting head office and providing proof of my allegations goes hand in hand with the possibility of her getting banned.