FFS this is so tedious, they are selling their bodies not fucking sweets they can choose who they fucking want to sell to including the man on the moon if they so wish.

It's so easy to point the finger.

I'm Korean and do not want to mingle with other races... My preference, my life...

Do not try force people to be with other races if they don't want to.

On 2021-12-17 12:02:38 Locote said:
On 2021-12-17 06:48:13
So according to you people find certain physical attributes attractive or not based on how they were socialised? What a load of bullshit. I have a preference for women with fairer skin tones and delicate facial features, is that because I was socialised to prefer fairer skinned woman and dislike large noses? No. I lean more towards the school of thought that states biological or genetics determines such preferences. Anyone who has studied or observed behaviours and attitudes of people of various races in this country will have noticed various instinctual tendencies that are either specific or predominant to a race group.

Also race is a complex issue in this country and unlike many other racially diverse countries that share a homogenous culture, we do not have such an identity. If everyone was socialised the same way and share the same cultural identity then it could be argued that ROARing is purely colour based prejudice. You could even say that each race has a it's own "tribal" attitudes towards sex, prostitution, sex workers etc.

Also, SA is one of the most dangerous countries in the world and a sex worker is putting herself in a vulnerable position with each client and as such it's only natural that she would want to stick with what she is familiar and comfortable with. Anyone who has been on any community watch WhatsApp or radio group knows that when someone is getting robbed, the culprit is always a bravo male...it is what it is.

Well I disagree.

Our country is incredibly diverse, but generally a lot of peoples' experiences can be confined to pockets of this diversity. Think about where we go to school, practise our religions, which sports we watch/play, television shows we watch, music we listen to and which pubs/clubs/restaurants we frequent. Respectfully, I think we'd be naive to think that our lived experiences don't have a profound impact on what we find attractive in a sexual partner. We would certainly be naive if we thought that such a view was a load of bullshit.

My point was simple: it's not worth figuring out why a lady has a roar policy. It's their choice, so move on. She may be a flat out racist, just doesn't find black guys attractive or fears for her safety; AGAIN, other roar policies notwithstanding. It's not worth thinking about, I said to the person who posed the question.

I would also be careful to not make statements on innate behaviours of groups of people. It's actually dangerous. It's how certain behaviours are incorrectly and unfairly characterised as "typically Jewish/Black/Indian..."

On 2021-12-17 12:02:38 Locote said:
On 2021-12-17 06:48:13 NkosanaCharming said: I don't care bra. If it makes you feel any better you have specific preferences yourself. Whether the roar motivation is overtly racist or because a WG has been socialised to prefer certain physical attributes (other roar policies notwithstanding), I don't think it's worth mulling over. Note it and move on.

Funny story, I recall wanting to buy online content on an earlier profile of mine last year. We talked prices and types of videos. Just before I decided to send the cash (not sure why I missed it before) I noticed the 'roar'. I helped her apply the policy to online content as well.

So according to you people find certain physical attributes attractive or not based on how they were socialised? What a load of bullshit. I have a preference for women with fairer skin tones and delicate facial features, is that because I was socialised to prefer fairer skinned woman and dislike large noses? No. I lean more towards the school of thought that states biological or genetics determines such preferences. Anyone who has studied or observed behaviours and attitudes of people of various races in this country will have noticed various instinctual tendencies that are either specific or predominant to a race group.

Also race is a complex issue in this country and unlike many other racially diverse countries that share a homogenous culture, we do not have such an identity. If everyone was socialised the same way and share the same cultural identity then it could be argued that ROARing is purely colour based prejudice. You could even say that each race has a it's own "tribal" attitudes towards sex, prostitution, sex workers etc.

Also, SA is one of the most dangerous countries in the world and a sex worker is putting herself in a vulnerable position with each client and as such it's only natural that she would want to stick with what she is familiar and comfortable with. Anyone who has been on any community watch WhatsApp or radio group knows that when someone is getting robbed, the culprit is always a bravo male...it is what it is.

Oh god. Sociologists, anthropologists, psychologists, geneticists, you guys can all go home, all the open questions of your respective fields are all being solved by some knob with a comp sci honours degree who thinks "Bullshit. No. I lean towards..." is an actual argument.

I think this has a lot to do with entitlement. Because legislation enforces totally incompetent people to positions they should never have occupied, they feel it is their right that all women should also bow before them (no pun intended).They simply cannot understand that they cannot force certain things.

I have yet to read about a white guy complaining about a black girl not wanting to see him...Surely, that must also happen. Yet white guys dont whine here about racism, or whatever. They accept, understand and move on.

And even if it is brutal racism, there is absolute fuckall you can do about it. Good luck going to whatever court or human rights organisation, laying charges against a racist sexworker.

In fact, why dont you take that route. Then we can follow the thread in the newspapers, and dont have to read it on ESA!?

On 2021-12-17 16:23:16 JP82 said:


Oh god. Sociologists, anthropologists, psychologists, geneticists, you guys can all go home, all the open questions of your respective fields are all being solved by some knob with a comp sci honours degree who thinks "Bullshit. No. I lean towards..." is an actual argument.

Lol. Once again, Locote opines on a topic he clearly knows nothing about and makes a fool of himself.

On 2021-12-14 20:00:11 Johnboi said:
I respect that the WG has a right to decide who can visit her and not.
But am very curious to understand what is the reason for it. There is a reason for everything and I am just curious to know why.... Please don't want any debating just a simple explanation.

A WG is a human been, have rights and my make her own decisions on who to accommodate and who not. For example, some WGs will welcome visits by females and others will not. Others may choose to not allow FH or Greek while others may allow one or both, this reasons go on and on. On the end of the day its rights and preferences of WGs and these must be respected (like you said).

Oh no ... it's another "UPROAR" ... said with a Lil Wayne voice ... :)

I find that a lot of the time, the ROAR policy, as it pertains to race, is also largely determined by the predominant race of the clientele the lady services.

I have heard, on numerous occasions from ladies who advertise ROAR, that soms caucasian males would not want return to them if they are seen to service "people of colour."

So the question posed in this thread, could potentially be being asked to the wrong audience.

As a black man, I have been even asked by some of the caucasian ladies not to rate/review as it could alienate their caucasian customers.

The reality is that caucasian women charge more than their black/coloured/Indian counterparts, and as a result, it appears as though caucasian males mare more likely to consistently pay those rates, and if the regular clients have an issue with the lady seeing people of colour, then from a business perspective, I can see why some would not want to jeopardize regular income for adhoc encounters that could drive regular customers away.

Perhaps I have misread things but I gather that the above,could potentially be a contributor to ROAR policies as they pertain to race.

So instead of the gun being pointed at the ladies. Could the Caucasian males who have contributed to this thread, weigh on on whether or not they have a racial preference on who the ladies they visit see?

I apologize if this has been covered before in this or other threads.

Thanks

You've hit the nail on the head @ RenePhillips. You will however not get a response from said punters as that requires something called balls, which we can agree is in short supply. Over the years, quite a few wg's have showed that they have more 'balls' by explaining their ROAR policy but you will not find the same from those punters who put pressure on certain wg's not to see men of colour.

Some white ladies can bear testimony to being on the receiving end of verbal abuse and eternal condemnation from white punters because they choose to see other races.