What I missed?!

Jirre, reading just the first page I must admit I now realy miss Veronica on the forum!

Any ways my 2 rupees worth of commentary:

Like I always said many times before, any WG no matter how she looks whether super model or female shrek, can charge whatever the hell they please. Every punter has the choice to decide on their sliding scale whether they willing to pay the price or not.

Funny thing is, on this very forum we had more than one "executive" who mentioned he wants the ladies to charge them excessive rates because "it makes them feel good" to pay higher rates. (I remember under my Muja nic I took the micky the hell out of that guy, lol.)

So, there is definitely that tiny niche market of punters who want to pay huge sums of moola becoz it makes them feel good. (Any psychiatrists in the house to help explain that?)

Just a few months ago another "executive" popped up detailing in an essay here what he is looking for in an super upmarket WG, (or the word these types use, "courtesan"). I read this bra's description for which he states he was willing to pay thousands. I still mentioned on that thread too that exactly what he detailed I get for R850.

Cape Town is notorious for these R10K to R20K an hour WGs. Kinda makes sense them trying to exploit the USD/Pound/Euro tourists. I've checked at leased two out years ago, and truth be told, I wasn't impressed with their looks.

Similarly, there is a CT sometimes on ESA, who literally 15 to 18 months charged R800 an hour and now if you call her fee is R5000 an hour. Year and a half later. She must be getting clients willing to pay that.

My personal limit is R2500. Very very very rare indulgence. Last time on *that* Logan. When I saw her ad back briefly a month ago I was so tempted again until a punter said her fees are currently way north of that. Eish.

Which brings me to what legendary Valentina wrote here. Said to us ordinary folk, we don't feel spending a few hundred bucks. Then you get the millionaires who don't feel it if they drop a few thousands. Then there's the billionaires, who don't feel it when they drop a few million. Good perspective. Look at those Mugabe pieces of shit sons partying it up in Jozi for example.

Oh, and speaking of Valentina, she was one lady who could easily have charged thousands per hour!

Any ways, kudos to WG Miss Knightly for exploiting the old adage, "There is no such thing as bad publicity!"

I am moving to Cape town,please boys put my r5000 per hour money aside.make me a millionaire please

Okay... a lot has been said...

I have been with her for a longer booking. She does negotiate her fee for a weekend... and it is worth it. Ill book her again, at least once a year. And there are other ladies charging the same fees - also worth it. And NO she doesn't have diamonds or golden anything... I just feel like a million R with her.

If you think I am a fool for doing it - it is just your opinion, I know who I am and what I want and I do not need your approval.

I have had a very disappointing booking, to say the least, on this site with a top 5 girl and when I reviewed her everybody went nuts... I had bookings with a lot of WG an MG and I have reviewed very little of them... as I had nothing new to add to what has been said. I don't need to review every booking - but if it is very good or very bad Ill review.

Nobody can rate her on this form because although she has a banner add she does not have an profile on ESA. One thing I know is that she doesn't she 3 or four clients a day - so if we share some time I don't "compete" with her phone or her time for the next client and that make our time special and that's why I will return.

To clarify if I want to treat myself Ill go with a Julia Knightly and I am guaranteed a good time. If I feel in the mood Ill book somebody else and if I have a great time nothing stop me from tipping over the asking fee...

So if you cant afford R10K you can still book anyone and pay the fee - why this outburst on something you cant change or take part in. To each his / her own... the sun shine on everybody.

enough said. I am out.

Boss blue eyes, exactly what I said. You gots your WG decision sliding scale that makes you happy.

I'm just dissapointed that she be willing to *negotiate* her fees for a weekend ;-)

From her site: Photographs will be submitted upon request. Also note that all pictures reflecting on this website are for aesthetic purposes only and that these pictures are NOT of me.

Price is an agreement between buyer and seller, and you are free to charge what you think you are worth. You are not free to insult those who charge differently, that is what is at issue here. Reminding others that you are a professional who only does this on the side, and that you (unlike them) are "of high calibre" is derogatory social signalling.

Some people when they hit rock bottom. Ask for a jack-hammer

Dear JK,
You owe every lady on ESA an apology for being so rude and creating so much drama!

So, the pictures of "Julia Knightly" on her site are not of her...you have to make contact and submit information to get pictures...hmmm. BTW, one of the images is that of real model [ Name & Link removed by Admin ] [sorry, link doesn't seem to work; you can use this and then click on the [ Name of website removed by Admin ] return to get to the page [ Link removed by Admin ]
...I wonder if she gave permission for her image to be used on Julia's "high class" site...hmmm

Julia's booking page:

"If we haven't met yet, filling out the below will give me all the info I need to screen you as you safely measure and to find time for us in our calendars. I have a pretty busy, buzzing life so I tend to prioritise gentlemen who have taken the time to fill out this thoroughly."

Notice, other than the high-class typo "safely" instead of safety, a would-be client is told they will be prioritized if they thoroughly give out information such as:

Name
E-mail
Phone Number
Location
Age
Ethnicity
Wish List

Now given that a cautious person will give a false name and a punter phone number, how does this improve Ms. Knightly's safety? But it does give someone a chance to perhaps obtain an IP address and maybe even a fetish wish list...hmmm

She goes on to emphasize using e-mail as the contact mode:
("I am also not always in a position to tend to phone calls of this nature for obvious reasons of being out on a date, being in public or being busy with my actual professional career therefore it is advisable to rather contact me via email initially.")...hmmm

Now, as exclusive as she claims to be, she nonetheless has a whole group of friends ready to take the bookings she can't make

"In the event that I might not be available, I do have a very carefully handpicked handful of exquisite friends who will happily oblige. They will not fail you....I promise. For your convenience, one of my model friends, Lee James, offers in-calls at her luxurious and dicreet Bryanston home."...hmmm

BTW, I like the typo "dicreet", shows class and attention to detail...

Now I wonder if Lee James of Bryanston is actually [ Name & Link removed by Admin ]

"[ Name removed by Admin ] , when she is not updating her modeling portfolio, may indeed be a speech therapist in Bryanston...hmmm

If you search a little, you'll find more, but I don't want to speculate too much here...

As for TwoBlueEyes' experience with Ms. Knightly, I refer to his reviews of Meg and, more importantly, of Gabriella, which ESA labeled as "malicious" www.esa.co.za/forum/thread.php

So, here we have someone trying very hard to get clients to give up as much information as possible, without giving even a picture of herself. Notice the comments here: [ Link removed by Admin ]

For someone so exclusive to not be available sounds a bit funny to me...

Well, enough. For me, I would steer well clear of someone who offers so little real information about herself, wants an astronomical fee, and wants so much information from clients before even making contact. It simply makes no sense to me to have a site where there are no actual photographs of this exclusive gem, and where she also acts as madam for her hand-picked "friends", who are also faceless.

CLEARLY there is no winner here. jK was wrong in her wording of this post. She comes off a being high handed and better than the rest. (BS).
And my oh my! The way the ladies attacked her like a wolf pack. Goes to show how classy they are. Jealous envious and effen nasty. All fucked up .