I can only imagine the circumcision debate has been discussed ad nauseam... but girls and guys of the purple world tell me with or without. And also can I be so bold as to ask why...

With. I don't see a reason to snip if you can keep it clean and I haven't had that issue in nearly 4 decades. On top of that, the ladies seem to love the shinny pink head. Plus it makes penetration easier kinda like a bearing when it's covering and you use it to ease inside while the skin stays put taking the friction but the head and shaft is penetrating under the skin.

I assume a reason not to though but I don't have any experience, lol. For one, the head is extremely sensitive so I assume cutting the skin of results in it being desensitised over time to accommodate in being touched all the time by your underwear so it takes away a lot of the sensation during sex. Plus the colour changes by being exposed to the elements.

Interesting Tx

On 2019-09-11 16:18:29 Need4Passion said:
With. I don't see a reason to snip if you can keep it clean and I haven't had that issue in nearly 4 decades. On top of that, the ladies seem to love the shinny pink head. Plus it makes penetration easier kinda like a bearing when it's covering and you use it to ease inside while the skin stays put taking the friction but the head and shaft is penetrating under the skin.

I assume a reason not to though but I don't have any experience, lol. For one, the head is extremely sensitive so I assume cutting the skin of results in it being desensitised over time to accommodate in being touched all the time by your underwear so it takes away a lot of the sensation during sex. Plus the colour changes by being exposed to the elements.

That says it all.

Men's foreskins have evolved the way they are for a reason. The same reason why women's clitorises have evolved the way they are. That is to enhance pleasure during sex. Any interference to the foreskin, or worse, the clitoris, by circumcision, is mutilation, is barbaric and belongs to the dark ages.

I mean research shows that circumcision is better."March 25, 2009 - Circumcised men have a 25% lower risk of genital herpes and a 35% lower risk of HPV, the virus that causes genital warts and cancers." Im lazy to referencr the whole thing. You should not get circumsized for aesthetic reasons. It is safer whether considered barbaric or not.

"Circumcision reduces heterosexual HIV-1 acquisition in men by at least 60%."Reference:The biology ofhow circumcision reduces
HIV susceptibility: broader implications forthe prevention feld Jessica L. Prodgerand Rupert Kaul2.

If you are a regular punter, its well worth it.

On 2019-09-11 19:12:41 Mysticmac said:
"Circumcision reduces heterosexual HIV-1 acquisition in men by at least 60%."Reference:The biology ofhow circumcision reduces
HIV susceptibility: broader implications forthe prevention feld Jessica L. Prodgerand Rupert Kaul2.

If you are a regular punter, its well worth it.

If you are a regular punter you will always use protection!!
With or without the snip for a regular punter there's no excuse for practicing unsafe sex !!
Just my 2cents worth....

On 2019-09-11 20:11:22 Wild_Weasel said:
On 2019-09-11 19:12:41 Mysticmac said: "Circumcision reduces heterosexual HIV-1 acquisition in men by at least 60%."Reference:The biology ofhow circumcision reduces
HIV susceptibility: broader implications forthe prevention feld Jessica L. Prodgerand Rupert Kaul2.

If you are a regular punter, its well worth it.

If you are a regular punter you will always use protection!!
With or without the snip for a regular punter there's no excuse for practicing unsafe sex !!
Just my 2cents worth....

Got you. A lot of people do oral without condom. So being circumcised helps. I do promote safe sex. I tell the girls I visit to perform oral with condom. Never too safe.

by the time it gets to bj the erection should be such that all spare skin is stretched already. nowhere for the bad stuff to hide :)