I see THAT repulsive word being used quite often on the site...
I am disappointed that even reputable SP's see themselves as just that...
I see it as a stygmatised term..coined by members of the human race centuries
ago.by characters far worse than "prostitutes" ever were...What is THAT word supposed to (and do) convey..TODAY?...It may also have legal implications,maybe not foreseen by naive WG's.
So if THAT term is going to stick lol..in present day and time. It should at least be placed in the perspective or place ("misplace") sic it should be..
In fact I would like to see it be defined...shaken a bit and either be accepted knowingly or rejected..
I for one see it as a totally outdated and disparaging term; not appropriate to people freed by present day values..whilst acting LEGALLY ..namely practising what they are entitled to do..namely enjoying the bodily freedom the South Arican Constitution guarantees them...!
This is no legal analysis or dissertation..so dont expect detail now...you are welcome to pose questions..please don't try to be a legal expert if you are not..
My quest is...why o why do some ladies refer to themselves by a degrading term..instead of holding your heads high and take your place amongst(or gfght for it) professions, some of which you got miles of moral high ground above like 99 % of the present day politicians and public servants..no "servants" read thieves..
Dont you think you deserve better treatment..?
I am referring to posts by punters AND WG's themselves and by LAW..
So where are the historians to tell us WHERE did the term "prostitute" originate from at first.
Who coined it.and why.? The "church"? or lazy housewives..? In whose interest is it to maintain the stigma of the "oldest profession"...?
Why and who stygmatised it in the first place...?
Is it not unconstitutional NOT to legalise "it" whatever you serve?...I think it IS...so it is merely for the asking..
Enough parapraphs for slow readers..?? I hope.LOL..