Good morning punters,

I use this forum for information pertaining to the services offered by a WG and quality of service punters experience when visiting advertisers on this site. With this information I make an educated decision of whether to visit this WG or not.

For some time now l've been coming across various reviews that seem to divert from the basic review relating to services offered and quality of the service. Some punters think a review should be a demonstration of their command of the english language or their literature writing techniques.

Is it too much to ask for that in future reviews, you still provide the key information that a fellow punter will require to make an informed decision to visit a WG or not?

My understanding of the review section is that this is a feature to assist punters and WG's in terms of separating the good WG and from the bad, whilst protecting the interests of both parties ... however nowdays it seems more a competition of my dick is bigger then yours in review writing skills! I've noted this amongst certain frequent punters in terms of providing flowery reviews hoping to out-do the previous reviewer instead of sticking to the basics of providing vital information that could assist the WG and punter alike ...

If the reviewer gives his 5 points and says he will return.. is that not sufficient to make a booking if she has many reviews.. what happens in the room will differ.. sometimes you might never click with a top lady and think others where being kind in a review... how you interpret it and write your review is your thing. A simple template is there to score points...the rest is just up to you what you to say. Some only say a sentence of few words others a half page 300 characters or more. Link me to a review you have done. You cant please the masses..
Thats my take...

I get it a bit. I find it hard to value the "I won't share details of what happened between us" type review. A lot of reviews seem to be written to win favour with the WG and not to provide info for the punters.

In my opinion. It is the punters parogative to write an essay or just a few words.

Every punter is different, just like any WG/MG is different. What is pleasurable to one, is not to the other.

I totally agree with you @in69 "You cannot please the masses"

I also find that sometimes the review is so derogatory and shows that the lady was noting more thank a fk doll or just a piece of meat. have some respect, for we are all human...

have a look at the review boneman did, on a lady this morning.

its not something I appreciate but is that what you like to read...

I agree with in 69....the review system is a matter of personal taste or preference and no one punter has the right to tell the rest how to spend their membership fees. That's why there are ratings. If you find it tedious, scan through the review and take note of the ratings. I for one don't like a detailed run down of every detail. To me, sex is still personal and private, those that do get detailed are a bit embarrassing although still appreciated.

On 2017-12-18 11:50:47 Veronica Franco said:
I agree with in 69....the review system is a matter of personal taste or preference and no one punter has the right to tell the rest how to spend their membership fees. That's why there are ratings. If you find it tedious, scan through the review and take note of the ratings. I for one don't like a detailed run down of every detail. To me, sex is still personal and private, those that do get detailed are a bit embarrassing although still appreciated.

I fully agree with you In69 and Vero

My sentiments in the opening comment of this thread echo that of RobbyColonel. @in69, I don't agree with reviewing the WG like a fk doll, however it is tedious reading a whole lot of flattery bullshit in a review where punters are competing to win the WG's favor ... it just makes it seem that these girls give preferential treatment to a selected few ... anyway best for me to just scroll the fuck on and live and let live ...

Why should clients compete to win favor if they didn't have a good experience? Makes no sense. But there are also very few ladies who are able to give consistent treatment to clients that they have no attraction to or chemistry with. We are human too and the services we offer cannot always be consistent from one client to another. I understand that after reading a review you expect the same experience, but that's isn't always possible as we also relate to various people differently.

On 2017-12-19 07:12:58 Veronica Franco said:
Why should clients compete to win favor if they didn't have a good experience? Makes no sense. But there are also very few ladies who are able to give consistent treatment to clients that they have no attraction to or chemistry with. We are human too and the services we offer cannot always be consistent from one client to another. I understand that after reading a review you expect the same experience, but that's isn't always possible as we also relate to various people differently.

yip so totally agree. Touche...