Good afternoon ladies and gentleman,

There seems to be some confusion as to when a comment should be left and when to review a lady.

Reviewing of a lady and her services:

Reviews are only to be made if you have been with the lady.
Gentleman, when you have spent some time with a lady and want to share the experience with your fellow punters, then a review is the way to go.
We urge you to please be a gentleman and be respectful towards the ladies and choose your words carefully.

Understandably when you have had a bad experience you want to vent and warn the other gentleman, but please do not use bad language and degrade the ladies on the site.

Should we find that you are degrading or using offensive words towards the ladies, we will have no choice but to ban you from posting.

Of course if you have had a good experience then there will be no bad words towards the ladies and we hope for you as a punter to have only good experiences.

Commenting:

Comments are to be constructive to the ladies profiles, again there will be no malicious comments allowed.
If you find that there is something on the profile that you do not like about the lady and want to say your say, please do it constructively and
respectfully.

For example... in the photograph on the ladies profile the ladies nails polish is cracked and chipped, the constructive comment would be, the photo looks great its a pity that the ladies nail polish is cracked and chipped.
a Nonconstructive/malicious comment will be, I wish this bitch will do her nails properly.

If you have not seen the lady yet then you will be leaving a comment, if you phoned and you had an appointment and the lady either cancelled or simply did not keep to her side of the agreement, then it is a comment and not a review.

Gentleman I will be policing the comments and reviews from this point forward.

If you see any comments or reviews that violates the spirit of being constructive and polite, please let me know, report the post.

If in doubt that you are being constructive just DON'T comment.

Kind regards
Antionette
ESA support

Hi Antionette,

Would you kindly contact me. I cannot get through to your offices and need help with a remark under my reviews.

Hi Mia Bbw

I am calling but there is no answer


Regards
Antionette
ESA

Dear Mia Bbw

I have reached you and we have spoken about the issue at hand, thank you for making contact with me.

Have a good evening.

Antionette
ESA

Hi Antionette

Thank you for the clarification. The most common "hurtful" comment I keep seeing is punters seeing a lady has large hands or strangely shaped nipples and immediately there is a concern about someone being transgender.

I do understand shemales but there is no classification for someone who has undergone a full gender transformation which I think we do need.
The very idea of it terrifies many on the forums. Don't get me wrong, I fully believe anyone can identify as any gender they like however I am not attracted to someone in this situation (as in sexual attraction). I have a preference which isn't the same as being phobic.

Kind regards
Timtam

On 2017-10-29 14:16:37 ESA Forum Admin said:
Gentleman I will be policing the comments and reviews from this point forward.

No doubt you think you are doing a good and noble thing but this will be the death of reviews, an already flawed system. Setting up an echo chamber where only positive sentiments are allowed is a massive dis-service to other punters. As the saying goes, you can't polish a turd. If a lady gives extremely kak service, if she is bitchy towards the customer the whole time because she's jonesing for her next fix, or whatever, and the review is only allowed to say "the service overall was good but its a pity she has such a bad post-nasal drip and such an inconvenient rash in her arms".

But it's Eddie's site and I am sure you are doing this with his blessing, and I am equally sure every WG will jump on the bash oraljim bandwagon thinking I don't have respect for them (which isn't true). But I have more respect for the truth. And whenever anyone steps in to censor the truth there is a big problem looming.

While I do agree that bad news can be delivered politely, and should be, not every review can be constructive and glowing, and threatening to ban people from posting to the forum if they don't conform to your nebulously-described set of rules of what YOU consider OK, will just cause even fewer people to review. Which is bad news for ESA.

On 2017-10-29 21:28:05 oraljim said:
On 2017-10-29 14:16:37 ESA Forum Admin said:

But it's Eddie's site and I am sure you are doing this with his blessing, and I am equally sure every WG will jump on the bash oraljim bandwagon thinking I don't have respect for them (which isn't true). But I have more respect for the truth. And whenever anyone steps in to censor the truth there is a big problem looming.

While I do agree that bad news can be delivered politely, and should be, not every review can be constructive and glowing, and threatening to ban people from posting to the forum if they don't conform to your nebulously-described set of rules of what YOU consider OK, will just cause even fewer people to review. Which is bad news for ESA.

.....most punters prefer to keep their experiences to themselves weither bad or good.....!

and some punters only write reviews/comments about bad/poor experience....but will never review/comment about good service .

On 2017-10-29 21:55:10 Lalaa No.1 said:
and some punters only write reviews/comments about bad/poor experience....but will never review/comment about good service .

I agree that's how it is now but it wasn't always. Yes, for a long time not every punter reviews. There are many guys who don't ever post to the forum at all and yet visit a lot of girls, and those punters will probably always be that way.

But reviews used to be more frequent (in my limited observation) and a better spread of good / bad. But you are right now it seems mostly negative stuff filters through because it takes a negative experience to overcome the basic reluctance to review at ALL.

Now ask yourself how we came to be in this position. The more punters are threatened by dictatorial admins (I am not saying Antoinette is one of them but we've had them in the past), the more they are censored, the less inclined they are going to be to post at all. Which is why I think Antoinette's post above, although well intentioned, wasn't thought through properly and was certainly worded in a combative way to the degree that at one person (myself) will never review again. Not that it's a big loss because I haven't written a review in a LONG time because I keep on visiting the same girls and I've said all that needs to be said. But knowing that I can be banned on a whim, without having a clear set of guidelines to follow, will absolutely 100% guarantee I will never review again and I bet I am not the only one who feels that way.

More and more rules as we move closer and closer to the totally offend no one nanny state. sign of the times

I don't get why people are freaking out about this. You are still allowed to post a negative comment/critique on someones profile if you have seen them or not.

Just be a bloody gentleman about it. If someones skin is not to your standard instead of saying jeez her skin is fucked say unfortunately her skin is not up to my standard.

Same goes with giving compliments instead of saying nice tits, rather say lovely breasts or boobs.

Some guys don't realize its people reading the comments made about them.