So I've had a break from punting for about 2 months and made my return yesterday.

During my 2 months sabbatical I decided that when I come back I will no longer give points for "Face" and "Body" in my reviews as those are optional ratings. I have noticed some punters are already doing the same.

So to the ladies -- it is nothing personal if I don't put it in your reviews please. I won't book you if I don't think you are hot!

To me the rating on body and face is subjective and will differ from person to person according to their preferences. What is beautiful to me will not be to the next guy.

What are your views on this ladies and gents?

Someone told me one day that his average on face would be a 3... now me thinking shit is there something wrong with my body or face or am I just average?
After a few visits he started giving me a 5, i asked him why and he said he got to know me and he thinks I'm beautiful to him.
My opinion is, rather rate her in what's attractive or beautiful to you.
The rating should be how you honestly feel(attracted) towards the lady. Not what other people see!

Thanks Meg. I see your point. It makes sense.

Question though: How will you feel if a guy goes and rates you a 2/5 for example? (He will have to be blind as a bat, but humour me please)

You say here that you were worried thinking there is something wrong or you were just average.

Understand what you saying Sir GreyKnight....and agree that body and face ratings are VERY subjective. What are the chance that a punter (not active on the forum..to see this) will wonder "why no rating...what went wrong?" Maybe replace the ratings with a comment then?.

"She had the face and body of Fergie (Black eyed peas)"..or something like that?

Sadly, a lot of punters will jump to the conclusion that the lady was sincerely ugly and/or that her body was full of scars/sagging/unsatisfactory in a 1000 ways. I would rather receive a 2/5 than no rating at all. #just my opinion. Kisses, Mynx

Mr Director Sir

Definitely as you say.
I did not think of the "what went wrong" thing. Damn now you make me think...

Btw... Fergie gave me some great fantasies with that body of hers!

Just remember that taste is a very subjective thing.

I might like athletic type ladies while Grey Knight might like ladies that are slightly more solidly build chassis wise. Kindly note that I am not calling them vetties....(as I suffer from that affliction).

If we visit the same girl we will have different ratings.

If she is slightly more sturdy, Grey Knight will give her a 5.
I might only give a 2.

By the same token If the lady we visited is athletic and more slim, she would get a 5 from me and a 2 from him.

So it is purely subjective.

But then again, given that you begin to know the preferences of the different punters, one would make allowances for that. Also we have Gold Membership.

LOL

Yes it's crucial to fill in the details....

Very touchy subject, do understand your view, but I am with Mynx on this, and will rather give a rating than no rating.

I normally find something beautiful in every one, so my standard is 5 and 5.

Mynx -- thank you. It is good to see it from a lady's perspective. And you are right punters will jump to conclusions probably.

I am also like you Yewrev. I see the beautiful in every lady I book.

INL -- more sturdy you say? Lmga! Did not think you would post it here. Balls of steel as usual...