Navigation
raul28
raul28 - Fellow punters
Fellow punters
Basic Member
Joined:
27 Dec 2012
Posts to Date: 228
View Profile
Posted: 2017-05-22 10:39:55
Edited: 2017-05-22 10:45:47

Can we initiate a thread where we going to throw all bad services providing wgs?

Before you post a link of the said wgs, esa needs to confirm it first, this means that after experiencing such service you don't waste time call the office and tell them about the wg and the experience.

Should this suggestion work, punters need to know that it doesn't give them an advantage to go out there and be jacks and be all malicious to wgs for their on personal issues, if a punter go that way he must be banned immediately.


I'm talking about the likes of this wg here...

www.esa.co.za/escorts/viewEscort.php

Tried and tested...she's a bad service provider.
Vanilla
Vanilla - Re: Fellow punters
Re: Fellow punters
Advertiser
Joined:
23 Mar 2015
Posts to Date: 753
  View Profile  
Posted: 2017-05-22 11:00:52
Edited: 2017-05-22 11:01:41

Dear raul28

I hope you don't mind me giving my opinion since this is addressed to "fellow punters", the idea is good in theory but might have a few negative "consequences". I don't like referring to men as punters but for the sake of relevance to the threat I will use the word.

1st of all this will create extra work for ESA and most punters are free users and not gold members which means even if ESA wanted to hire more admin staff they might not be able to afford an extra salary unless free users purchase gold membership and start contributing to the website they use.

Secondly I have noticed that some punters when they are disappointed from the service they have received for whatever reasons they tend to be "overly" negative even give the lowest marks on things like body and face whereas previous punters confirmed that the body looks like the pictures. I saw this not long ago when a very well known "reliable punter" confirmed the lady has a great body and another "reliable punter" out of disappointment said the body didn't look good but we can all see from the pictures that she looks hot.

Another "trend" is some girls sometimes send they "friends" to book certain girls, and give negative false reviews in exchange of freebies. I said more than I initially intended to say .....
Vanilla
Vanilla - Re: Fellow punters
Re: Fellow punters
Advertiser
Joined:
23 Mar 2015
Posts to Date: 754
  View Profile  
Posted: 2017-05-22 11:07:12

The last paragraph is just an addition that the idea might backfire and should not be given much attention, it's not the subject at hand anyway.
Vanilla
Vanilla - Re: Fellow punters
Re: Fellow punters
Advertiser
Joined:
23 Mar 2015
Posts to Date: 755
  View Profile  
Posted: 2017-05-22 11:07:15
Edited: 2017-05-22 11:08:38

Double post
raul28
raul28 - Re: Fellow punters
Re: Fellow punters
Basic Member
Joined:
27 Dec 2012
Posts to Date: 229
View Profile
Posted: 2017-05-22 11:15:23

I'll keep quiet on this one.

byron101
byron101 - Re: Fellow punters
Re: Fellow punters
Gold Member
Joined:
15 Feb 2017
Posts to Date: 41
View Profile
Posted: 2017-05-22 11:17:14

I agree with vanilla concerning more work for the esa team, the review system is there one should be accurate and honest about his encounter, if a girl has more ads as the girl mentioned above put that review under all of her adverts.

As for sassy in particular she needs to quit the industry and make way for the girls that we know can give an exceptional service.
[deleted]
[deleted] - Re: Fellow punters
Re: Fellow punters
More than 100 posts
Posted: 2017-05-22 11:19:14

Vanilla is right,

Service rated by one punter is not always the same for the other i.e: punter A recieves good service, but punter B recieves bad. Punter B then posts her link and she looses possible clients because she is now placed under this forum thread.

I understand your meaning in wanting to start this thread, but I think let the reviews speak for themselves, and let the punter decide.
BOOBS53
BOOBS53 - Re: Fellow punters
Re: Fellow punters
Gold Member
Joined:
9 Jun 2015
Posts to Date: 1978
View Profile
Posted: 2017-05-22 11:22:13

I think maybe one of the problems are " Different strokes for different blokes ".

I like a particular lady, her services and give her a good review but she is not your cup of tea and you maybe give her a bad review ... getting my drift. This can most probably have a negative impact on her business.

raul28
raul28 - Re: Fellow punters
Re: Fellow punters
Basic Member
Joined:
27 Dec 2012
Posts to Date: 230
View Profile
Posted: 2017-05-22 11:36:38

Most of you seem to be focusing mainly on giving yourise opinion.. I said this

"Before you post a link of the said wgs, esa needs to confirm it first, this means that after experiencing such service you don't waste time call the office and tell them about the wg and the experience"

If it takes goldmembership to suggest something or have a voice on this forum then it should be stated... I'll get one
Doubleslappedass
Doubleslappedass - Re: Fellow punters
Re: Fellow punters
Basic Member
Joined:
1 Jul 2015
Posts to Date: 753
View Profile
Posted: 2017-05-22 11:39:58

Hey Raul, why not use the review system for this? I am pretty sure that's why it is there, plus your review sticks with lady (until she gets a new profile at least) , in case you have not noticed threads on the forum disappear pretty quickly, all the Wit and wisdom we thought was fantastic is sent to the bottom for the thread pile and is pretty useless after a month or a year.. just check out the ongoing ass , cheek thread from havata , most of the girls from 3 months ago don't even exist..

I see you did not even bother to review the girl, that's not cool dude, you gotta warn your fellow punters in arms..

Reply

You must be logged in to post on this forum. Basic Membership is free and it only takes a minute to sign up. Alternatively, if you are already a member, please log in. You will be automatically returned to this page.

Legend


Hover mouse over icons for description

Back to Previous Page
For the best browsing experience, rotate your tablet horizontal.